Did Oren gaffe on missing US credit for Haiti help?

JTA — It’s a compelling hero-takes-the-fall narrative: Valiant little country takes the lead in rescuing a battered people and gets snubbed when it’s time for kudos.

It’s the picture Michael Oren, the former Israeli ambassador to the US, paints of Israel’s 2010 Haiti rescue operation in “Ally,” his book excoriating President Barack Obama’s treatment of Israel. Haiti’s devastating 7.0 magnitude earthquake, which struck outside the capital, Port-au-Prince, and killed hundreds of thousands (though the official death toll is disputed) comes at a pivotal moment in the book, when Oren believes the US-Israel relationship is on a downward trajectory.

There’s a problem, though: Except for the part about the uncommon valor of Israeli rescuers, none of it appears to be based on anything that actually happened.

The passage appears on pages 132-133, in a section punningly headlined “Tremors” and that describes tensions over Israeli-Palestinian peace, “as the White House and the Prime Minister’s Office pitched toward collision”:

“My foreboding only deepened on January 15, when Obama issued an official statement on Haiti. ‘Help continues to flow in, not just from the United States but from Brazil, Mexico, Canada, France, Colombia, and the Dominican Republic,’ the president declared. Omitted from the list was Israel, the first state to arrive in Haiti and the first to reach the disaster fully prepared. I heard the president’s words and felt like I had been kicked in the chest.”

• Israel was not “the first state to arrive in Haiti.” Israel arrived on the evening of January 15. According to this CNN timeline, the United States, Iceland, Canada, Spain, China, Argentina, Cuba and Brazil had rescue teams in place by January 13 and 14. The Dominican Republic was first. I’m also not sure what Oren means about Israel being the first to reach the disaster “fully prepared.” According to the CNN timeline, an Argentine field hospital had treated 800 people by January 13. Amos Radian, the Israeli ambassador to the Dominican Republic whose responsibility included Haiti, said in an interview that the Israeli hospital, launched Saturday, was the first among those countries sending teams in. The Argentine hospital was already in place.

• Obama delivered his remarks between 1:08 and 1:14 PM on Friday, January 15. The Israeli rescue teams arrived on January 15 – in the evening, according to Walla News. And, according to multiple news sources, including JTA, the Israeli army’s field hospital was not set up set up before Saturday morning, January 16.

So why would Oren have “felt kicked in the chest”? Israelis did not rescue or treat a single Haitian until after Obama delivered his remarks. Radian and a small Israeli advance team were on the ground prior to the speech, but there was no Israeli rescue or medical team in place when he spoke. What would have led Obama to cite Israel that Friday afternoon?

Dozens of countries had pledged assistance to Haiti, in addition to the seven cited by Obama — should he have mentioned all of them? The countries he mentioned all have longstanding relationships with Haiti, by dint of being neighbors, or because of a post-colonial relationship (France) and a substantial Haitian Diaspora (Canada) — why would Israel be in that group?

• Finally, Obama did nod to the broader effort – but the clause ending his sentence applauding the seven countries, “among others,” is dropped from Oren’s text.

I asked Oren’s aides and his publisher about the Haiti anomaly. I got a one-sentence reply from the publisher: “Penguin Random House does not comment on its editorial and vetting processes.”

I don’t doubt Oren felt “kicked in the chest,” as he describes it — it’s just that I can’t help but wonder why. An explanation would be relevant to understanding how he arrived at his thesis that Obama deliberately created daylight with Israel, which others have challenged.

The Haiti episode has already been picked up in columns in the New York Post and the New York Jewish Week; it is a potent tale.

Incidentally, at least two others berated Obama in real time, based on the same erroneous premise: Martin Peretz in his column then carried by The New Republic, and the Zionist Organization of America, which cited Peretz.

I asked Peretz what led him to his conclusion that Obama was snubbing Israel. I also asked him if he and Oren had spoken in real time about the purported snub.

He said he did not consult with Oren at the time, and he cited a CNN report describing American embarrassment at the relative efficacy of the Israeli operation and another in the Christian Science Monitor noting that Israel sent the team on January 14.

Which is true, and verifiable in this Foreign Ministry release, but beside the point. The team did not land until after Obama spoke, and was not in operation until the next day.