National Unity party chief Benny Gantz attacks the proposed state budget as “a partition plan,” discriminating between the sectors of society represented by the current coalition parties and the rest of Israel’s citizens.
This is “a budget that is solely aimed at separating those who have representation in the coalition from those who do not,” he says. “Instead of being called a state budget, it should be called a coalition budget.”
In particular, Gantz slams the coalition’s plan to transfer municipal taxes from wealthier local authorities to other ones as an “outrageous injustice” that will have to be “paid for by residents of south Tel Aviv,” generally considered to be a poorer section of the wealthy city.
The opposition party chief says that the budget is another example of what he has branded Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government’s divisive style: “This government divides us and functions as the government of half the people.”
The most divisive issue in Israeli politics this year has been the government’s attempt to constrain judicial power. The centrist party head says he continues to support ongoing dialogue to reach a broadly accepted reform, after a lawmaker from his party was recently criticized for hailing an alleged “victory” over the coalition in one part of the talks.
Gantz says he sees the ongoing negotiations hosted by President Isaac Herzog as “of utmost importance to democracy, to our resilience, to our security.”
“We hope and labor to make progress in them, and remember all the time that reaching agreements that will preserve democracy is critical,” he says, warning that “if anyone plays games, they will harm the citizens of Israel, and they will bear responsibility and the consequences.”
Gantz says that Israel’s strong, independent judiciary is an integral part of its perceived successes in the recent Operation Shield and Arrow against the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror group in Gaza. In particular, he points to “constitutional and legal” cover for using the Iron Dome air defense and implementing targeted assassinations, as well as preserving the ability to launch a surprise attack by obtaining the attorney general’s approval, rather than convening a cabinet meeting.
The former defense minister also offers backhanded praise for Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for “allowing the security forces to act responsibly” and “not as demanded by the opposition in the coalition” — presumably referring to the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, which before the operation had threatened to bolt the coalition if its Gaza policies weren’t made more aggressive.