Knesset legal adviser accuses Rothman of threatening him during debate on AG powers

Video shows Knesset Law Committee chairman whispering to legal adviser Gur Bligh, who then snaps back, telling him: ‘You will not threaten me!’

MK Simcha Rothman (L) argues with legal adviser to the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee Gur Bligh at the Knesset in Jerusalem, November 24, 2025. (Noam Moshkovitz/Knesset spokesperson office)
MK Simcha Rothman (L) argues with legal adviser to the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee Gur Bligh at the Knesset in Jerusalem, November 24, 2025. (Noam Moshkovitz/Knesset spokesperson office)

Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee legal adviser Gur Bligh on Monday accused committee chair MK Simcha Rothman of threatening him during the panel’s discussion on the government’s contentious plan to split the role of the attorney general.

During remarks from former Likud minister Dan Meridor, Rothman whispered inaudibly to Bligh, who then loudly told the lawmaker: “You will not threaten me.”

It was unclear what Rothman said to Bligh, though after the legal adviser accused him of threats, he said, “I’m sorry?! What are you yelling at me about?”

Chiming in, Democrats MK Gilad Kariv told Rothman off for threatening Bligh, saying: “Don’t talk like that to the legal adviser, you thug.”

The discussion was briefly paused during the interaction, before order was restored and the meeting resumed without incident.

Rothman, a member of the far-right Religious Zionism party and an architect of the government’s judicial overhaul, has pushed a bill that would split the attorney general’s position into three jobs — legal adviser to the government, prosecutor general, and government representative in the courts — and give the government complete control over appointments to those roles, amid the coalition’s ongoing efforts to fire Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara.

Meridor, a former justice minister who served in several of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinets, said in the committee meeting that the efforts to split the role are part of a wider attempt to “completely change Israel into a non-democratic regime.”

Proponents of the bill to break up the attorney general role say that the position holds too much power and has an inherent conflict of interest.

Critics say the legislation would deal a death blow to the already-sparse system of checks and balances on executive power in Israel.

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara attends a hearing of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee at the parliament in Jerusalem, September 30, 2025. (Oren Ben Hakoon/ Flash90)

Coalition lawmakers last month advanced the bill in a 59-44 preliminary vote, pushing the legislation to Rothman’s committee, before it returns to the Knesset plenum for further readings.

The coalition has been trying for months to fire Baharav-Miara, accusing her of working against the government and undermining its interests. She has opposed several of the government’s signature legislative initiatives, including its controversial proposed judicial overhaul, and has refused to defend the government in proceedings in the High Court against some of its policies and legislation.

Most Popular
read more:
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.