Whistleblower alleges ‘grave breaches’ by White House over security clearances
Official says top aides being given access to top secret material against recommendations; Bolton, Kushner, Ivanka Trump may be among group
WASHINGTON — Some 25 White House officials including top advisers of President Donald Trump were given security clearances despite staff recommendations against it, a whistleblower has told Congress.
House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings said in a letter Monday that White House security official Tricia Newbold detailed to his panel “grave breaches of national security at the highest levels of the Trump Administration.”
None of the 25 were named, but in his letter, addressed to White House counsel Pat Cipollone, Cummings requested information relating to clearances for National Security Adviser John Bolton, former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner, and several other top security officials.
He also said he would subpoena Carl Kline, Newbold’s former superior at the White House Personnel Security Office, to testify to the committee on the clearances, along with other officials.
Newbold told the committee that the Personnel Security Office recommended against security clearances — which allow access to top secret materials — for the 25, Cummings said.
Two of them were top-level officials in national security.
Newbold told the committee that the recommendations for denial were for serious questions involving foreign influence, conflicts of interest, personal conduct issues, financial problems, drug use, and criminal acts.
But the 18-year veteran of the White House said they were pressured to change their recommendations and overruled by Kline and higher-ups.
And when she pressed the issues, Kline and others retaliated against her, she said, including suspending her without pay for two weeks in early February.
“I would not be doing a service to myself, my country, or my children if I sat back knowing that the issues that we have could impact national security,” Newbold told the committee.
“I want it known that this is a systematic… issue,” she said.
Interim clearances questioned
Questions about security clearances have been raised ever since Trump took office on January 20, 2017.
Flynn was forced out of the White House within weeks after questions were raised about his private discussions with Russia’s US ambassador, as well as other foreign business dealings.
Kushner, who with his wife were made top presidential advisers, also raised warning lights due to his overseas business ties and a looming debt problem that was a potential conflict of interest.
Last year the White House was also questioned about the security clearance granted to Trump aide Rob Porter despite domestic abuse allegations from two ex-wives.
In testimony to the committee, Newbold described the Trump White House as far more lax on security issues that previous presidents she had worked for.
An abnormally large number of staffers had interim security clearances for long periods, including several for the highest level of secrecy classification that granted them access to “sensitive compartmented information,” or SCI.
Other government agencies, she said, questioned why the White House had so many individuals with interim SCI clearances.
A number of those individuals, she told the committee, eventually were denied permanent clearances, including two high-level officials. But in the meantime they had gained access to some of the most restricted intelligence the government has.
