After uproar, UN withdraws Iran invite to Syria talks

After uproar, UN withdraws Iran invite to Syria talks

Rebels threatened to boycott Geneva II following surprise invitation; Ban Ki-moon ‘deeply disappointed’ in Iranian statements

Jordanian Foreign Minister and President of the United Nations Security Council Nasser Judeh, right, has a conversation with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as a Security Council meeting began at UN headquarters on Monday, January 20, 2014. (photo credit: AP/Craig Ruttle)
Jordanian Foreign Minister and President of the United Nations Security Council Nasser Judeh, right, has a conversation with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as a Security Council meeting began at UN headquarters on Monday, January 20, 2014. (photo credit: AP/Craig Ruttle)

GENEVA (AP) — UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon withdrew his invitation to Iran to join this week’s Syria peace talks, saying he is “deeply disappointed” by Iran’s statements Monday.

A spokesman for Ban Ki-moon announced the withdrawal less than 24 hours after Ban surprised the US and others by saying he had invited Syria’s closest regional ally.

The withdrawn invitation came shortly after Iran’s UN ambassador declared the Islamic Republic wouldn’t join the Syria talks if required to accept 2012 Geneva roadmap.

A spokesman for Ban, Martin Nesirky, said senior Iranian officials had assured Ban that Iran understood the terms of his invitation.

The last-minute UN invitation for Iran to join this week’s Syria peace talks threw the long-awaited Geneva conference into doubt Monday, with the US saying the offer should be rescinded and the main opposition group saying it would boycott the talks.

The surprise invitation, extended Sunday by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, set off a flurry of diplomatic activity to salvage the talks aimed at ending Syria’s ruinous three-year civil war.

The conference is set to begin Wednesday in the Swiss luxury resort city of Montreux, with high-ranking delegations from the United States, Russia and close to 40 other countries attending. Face-to-face negotiations between the Syrian government and its opponents — the first of the uprising — are to start Friday in Geneva.

But the uproar over Iran’s invitation threatened to scuttle the entire event.

The Syrian National Coalition issued an ultimatum, saying that Iran must commit publicly within hours to withdraw its “troops and militias” from Syria and abide by a 2012 roadmap to establish a transitional government. Otherwise, the group said, the UN should withdraw its invitation for Tehran to take part.

The coalition, which had voted late Saturday to attend after months of rancorous debate, said if those conditions are not met by 7 p.m. GMT Monday, it would not attend the talks.

But Hadi Bahra, a member of the coalition’s political committee, said the group was willing to be flexible, to a degree, with its deadline.

“If there are serious efforts and commitment, then it will be extended, but for sure not beyond midnight,” he told The Associated Press.

It is not clear what had exactly motivated Ban to issue the invitation, but it came hours after he said he had received assurances from Tehran that it accepted the premise of the talks — to establish a transitional government with full executive powers in Syria, which has been ruled by President Bashar Assad’s family since 1970.

Iran is Assad’s strongest regional ally and has supplied his government with advisers, money and materiel since the Syrian uprising began in 2011. The Islamic Republic’s allies, most notably the Lebanese Shiite militant group Hezbollah, have also gone to Syria to help bolster Assad’s forces.

The last-minute decision appeared to take the US and its European allies by surprise. An Iranian statement said Iran had accepted the invitation “without accepting any pre-conditions.”

Senior US officials said Iran has still not met the criteria to participate in the conference and its invitation must be withdrawn unless it fully and publicly endorses the aims of the meeting.

Speaking to reporters in a conference call, the officials said public statements from Iran fall “well short” of what is require for Tehran’s participation, adding that they expect the UN to reevaluate and reverse its decision unless Iran changes course.

They declined to speculate as to what would happen if Iran does not meet the criteria and the invitation is not withdrawn, adding that the US would not see the point in holding the conference unless all participants accepted its goals.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter using their names.

France, another strong supporter of the opposition coalition, took the same line, with the country’s UN ambassador, Gerard Araud, saying “the ball is in Iran’s camp” and Iran “must accept explicitly” the terms of the 2012 roadmap.

In New York, Russia’s UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin said “of course” both the US and Russia were consulted about the Iran invitation, and he said that if the Syrian opposition boycotts the talks, “that would be a big mistake.”

Ban’s spokesman, Martin Nesirky, said the secretary-general was “urgently considering his options” in light of the “disappointing conduct of some participants” involved in the peace talks after he invited Iran to attend.

Nesirsky told reporters in New York that Ban “is dismayed” at the developments and that despite assurances, Iran “has made disappointing public statements” that suggest Tehran does not accept the terms of this week’s peace talks.

In Tehran, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham was quoted by the official IRNA news agency saying that Iran does not recognize the 2012 Geneva roadmap because it did not attend the conference that drafted it.

Saudi Arabia, a main backer of the Syrian opposition and a bitter regional rival of Tehran, also said Iran is not qualified to attend the conference but stopped short of threatening to boycott.

The negotiations aim to broker a political resolution to a conflict that has killed more than 130,000 people, displaced millions and put entire towns and neighborhoods under military siege in the worst humanitarian crisis in decades.

Diplomats and political leaders acknowledge that the prospects of achieving such a lofty goal any time soon are slim at best — with the opposition riveted by internal divisions. Infighting between rebels in northern Syria has killed more than 1,000 people in the past month.

Both the government and the opposition have suffered enormous losses, but even now, neither side appears desperate enough to budge from its entrenched position. At this point, just getting the antagonists into the same room to start what is expected to be a long process that could drag on for years would be perceived as a success.

Invitations to the one-day meeting of foreign ministers had been subject to approval by the initiating states, Russia and the United States, but the two countries had been at an impasse over Iran.

Syria’s crisis began in the heyday of the Arab Spring uprisings that swept away authoritarian leaders in Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen. Unlike the others, Syria’s leadership responded to largely peaceful protests for political reform with a withering crackdown. That slowly forced the opposition to take up arms and gave birth to a civil war that has also spawned a proxy battle between regional Shiite Muslim power Iran and Sunni heavyweight Saudi Arabia.

The cumulative effect of the war has been disastrous. Syria lies in ruins, its economy shattered, its rich social fabric shredded.

Lucas reported from Beirut. Associated Press writers Bassem Mroue in Beirut, Lori Hinnant in Paris, Matthew Lee in Washington, and Anna Cara at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press.

read more: