US church votes to divest from companies operating in West Bank
search

US church votes to divest from companies operating in West Bank

United Church of Christ urges boycott of Ahava Dead Sea products, SodaStream; two more churches weigh similar resolutions

The Rev. Geoffrey A. Black, the General Minister and President of the United Church of Christ (YouTube screenshot)
The Rev. Geoffrey A. Black, the General Minister and President of the United Church of Christ (YouTube screenshot)

NEW YORK — The top legislative body of the United Church of Christ voted Tuesday to divest from companies with business in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, a sign of the growing momentum of a protest movement against Israeli policy.

The church also voted to boycott products made in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The US-based liberal Protestant group’s General Synod endorsed the action on a vote of 508-124 with 38 abstentions.

Later Tuesday, the denomination was to vote on whether to label Israeli policies in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as “apartheid.”

The resolution urged the divestment from “the following companies that have been found to profit from the occupation of the Palestinian territories by the state of Israel: Caterpillar Inc., Motorola Solutions, Hewlett-Packard Development Company LP or its successors, G4S, and Veolia Environnement[sic] plus its 352 subsidiaries.”

With regard to a boycott by those affiliated of the United Church of Christ, the resolution “calls upon upon all national entities of the church to boycott goods identified as produced in or using the facilities of illegal settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territories, including, but not limited to, Ahava skin care products, SodaStream products, and Hadiklaim dates; and upon church members to join boycotts of such goods in their local communities.”

A Palestinian woman works at SodaStream's plant in Mishor Adumim, February 2, 2014 (photo credit: Nati Shohat/Flash90)
A Palestinian woman works at SodaStream’s plant in Mishor Adumim, February 2, 2014 (photo credit: Nati Shohat/Flash90)

Last year, the Presbyterian Church (USA) voted to sell stock in a few companies whose products are used by Israel in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The United Church of Christ resolution was broader. Delegates are calling on the denomination’s financial arms to sell off stock in any company profiting from what the church called human rights violations arising from the occupation.

The church’s two major financial arms, a pension board and investment fund, together control nearly $4 billion. Each is guided by directors who can decide whether to follow the call for divestment. If they do sell off stock, the economic impact on Israel is expected to be negligible.

Still, the vote aims to bring moral pressure for change from within the US, Israel’s closest and most important ally.

Peter Makari of Global Ministries, an agency that is part of the United Church of Christ, said the resolutions “reflect our urgent concern for the worsening effects of the Israeli occupation on Palestinian people and lives, including the disparity in rights and power.” The church affirmed Israel’s right to exist, along with a “sovereign, independent” Palestinian state.

The American Jewish Committee, an advocacy group based in New York, slammed the resolutions and said the action would “bolster those who oppose peace.”

Separately, the Episcopal Church, meeting in Salt Lake City, was considering a divestment resolution. And at another meeting this week, the Mennonite Church USA will also take up a divestment proposal.

The votes take place as the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, known as BDS, gains strength on US college campuses and in many places in Europe. The Israeli government and many Jewish leaders have condemned the movement as anti-Semitic and an attempt to delegitimize Israel.

Makari said the United Church of Christ vote was not “a blanket endorsement” of BDS, “but it’s in the spirit of the call.”

The movement grew from a 2005 international call by Palestinian groups as an alternative to armed struggle over control of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, which Israel captured in 1967 and Palestinians seek for an independent state.

BDS advocates say the movement, based on the campaign against South African apartheid decades ago, is aimed at Israeli policy, not Jews, in response to two decades of failed peace talks and expanded Israeli settlement of the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

read more:
less
comments
more