Hitting back at Netanyahu, Shin Bet chief defends probe into leaked intel, slams ‘conspiracies’ aimed to weaken his agency

Ronen Bar, the head of the Shin Bet, has written a furious letter defending its investigation of the scandal regarding the theft and leaking of classified IDF intelligence material, Channel 12 news reports, and accusing critics of peddling conspiracies and seeking to weaken the agency at a time of war.

In the letter, reportedly written in reply to complaints made by rabbis from the religious Zionist community about the treatment of the suspects in the case and the probe itself, Bar responds to a series of bitter allegations, many of which were made publicly eight days ago by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the handling of the case, but does not mention Netanyahu by name.

Netanyahu has been widely reported to be contemplating dismissing Bar, as well as the current IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi, and Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, though he has not publicly acknowledged that.

The Shin Bet probe led to the November 21 indictments on grave national security charges of Eli Feldstein, an aide to Netanyahu, and an unnamed IDF reserves officer. On November 23, Netanyahu issued a lengthy video, in which he accused investigators of treating the suspects “like the worst terrorists, handcuffed for days,” claimed that there was selective investigation of alleged leaks, and asserted that vital intelligence material was deliberately being kept from him.

Netanyahu is not a suspect in the case.

In his letter to the rabbis, as quoted by Channel 12, Bar notes that the Shin Bet has looked into 19 cases of leaked material relating to the IDF, Shin Bet, and Mossad since the Hamas invasion and slaughter on October 7, 2023. He makes clear that the probe of the leaked material that led to Feldstein “began inside the IDF” — debunking the notion that the Prime Minister’s Office had been targeted by the investigators in some way. “It only reached where it reached as it developed,” he writes of the probe.

Some of those 19 probes are completed; “some ended with indictments and sanctions,” he writes.

Bar stresses that the Shin Bet investigates its own people using the same methods it uses when investigating other hierarchies, “without torturing those who are investigated” and “under external and judicial supervision.”

Implicitly criticizing Netanyahu for not definitively acknowledging personal responsibility for the failures surrounding October 7, and for refusing to establish a state commission of inquiry into the disaster, Bar reportedly goes on: “As far as I know, members of the defense establishment, myself included, were the first (and to date almost the only) people to admit to their responsibility [for October 7].

“The first to call for the opening of a state commission of inquiry that would put an end to the conspiracies, that would give a little comfort to those who lost those most dear to them, and that would lead to the necessary correction — was the Shin Bet, immediately after the war erupted.”

In a further implied response to criticisms of the probe by Netanyahu and some of his supporters, Bar continues: “To my sorrow, people with particular interests, commentators and others, are choosing to skew realities, if not to manufacture conspiracies, to fire arrows, to weaken and delegitimize the organizations that are fighting to defend the [national] home. The Shin Bet, out of a statesmanlike restraint, chooses to remain silent. So it is important that opinion leaders from across the spectrum, who are trusted and followed by the many and the good, make sure their words are well-founded.”

Bar directly responds to the prime minister’s castigation of the treatment of the suspects — echoing Netanyahu’s own language, again without naming him — by stating that the accusation of mistreatment of suspects, “that they are humiliated and handcuffed as though they are terrorists, borders on incitement. It is apparently intended to weaken the organization. Even at a time of war.”

The Shin Bet, Bar vows, “will continue with its work in accordance with the law.”

Responding to the allegation of selective investigations, Bar further writes: “The Shin Bet was not called in to investigate the theft of documents and the leaking of information from them because of what was written in them, but in order to protect the process by which the [classified intelligence] was obtained.” The damage caused by the incident was immeasurable, he writes, “in lives, in the wellbeing of the hostages, in achieving the aims of the war and protecting the soldiers.”

Furthermore, he adds, “The probe has shown that if we had not intervened, the damage would have been even greater.”

Condemning the investigation as though it was skewed from the start because of where its conclusions led it, he writes, “defies common sense and besmirches the entire ranks of investigators, whose work has thwarted thousands of terror attacks and espionage activities.”