Judges challenge Netanyahu lawyer’s claim that delaying recusal law would ‘nix election results’

Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at a High Court of Justice hearing on petitions against the government's prime minister recusal law, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, September 28, 2023. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)
Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut at a High Court of Justice hearing on petitions against the government's prime minister recusal law, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, September 28, 2023. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

Michael Rabello, a private lawyer representing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the High Court hearing on petitions against the recusal law, tells judges that voiding or delaying the implementation of the legislation would “leave open the option of a head-on collision between the branches of government, the option of the trampling of the Knesset” by ordering the premier to recuse himself.

He says such a scenario would be “a cancellation of the election results.”

Justices respond that what’s on the line isn’t an annulment of the entire law, but only a delay in its application.

Chief Justice Esther Hayut says: “How does delaying the implementation of the recusal law cancel the elections?”

Rabello is representing Netanyahu after Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara refused to do so and argued against the government’s position.

Most Popular
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.