Boteach apologizes to Susan Rice for genocide ad

Rabbi sorry for full-page spread in NYT accusing US national security adviser of turning blind eye to genocide

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, pressed into service as film critic by The Times of Israel. (courtesy: Shmuley.com)
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, pressed into service as film critic by The Times of Israel. (courtesy: Shmuley.com)

NEW YORK — Rabbi Shmuley Boteach apologized to US National Security Adviser Susan Rice for his organization’s full-page ad in The New York Times accusing Rice of turning a blind eye to the Rwandan genocide of 1994.

In an Op-Ed in the Washington Post titled “Dear Susan Rice, I’m Sorry,” Boteach said that the ad placed by This World was more of a personal attack than an opinion on policy.

“That was not our intent,” Boteach wrote. “We hoped to focus on policy, and we failed. I apologize fully and hope you will forgive me. It is the job of a communicator to communicate. Effectively. And having come up short, I will try again.”

The ad, which said “Susan Rice has a blind spot: Genocide,” noted Rice’s complaints about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s recent speech to Congress about the proposed Iran nuclear deal. It said Rice’s objections “could not be more wrong” and criticized her for refusing to use the word “genocide” in reference to Rwanda as a member of President Bill Clinton’s national security team.

An array of Jewish organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League and the Jewish Federations of North America, condemned the ad, which ran on February 28.

US National Security Adviser Susan Rice speaks during the American Israel Public Affairs Committee 2015 Policy Conference, March 2, 2015 in Washington, DC. (photo credit: Mark Wilson/Getty Images/AFP)
US National Security Adviser Susan Rice speaks during the American Israel Public Affairs Committee 2015 Policy Conference, March 2, 2015 in Washington, DC. (photo credit: Mark Wilson/Getty Images/AFP)

In his apology, Boteach also said he was sorry for the ad’s image of a row of skulls, which he said were from the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide.

“It is a shocking and jarring image, as are all images of genocide,” Boteach wrote. “But I sincerely regret that the use of the image — not immediately recognizable to people unfamiliar with the Rwandan genocide — lent itself to being misinterpreted as something deliberately disrespectful and macabre.”

Most Popular
read more:
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.