Iranian dissidents file lawsuit against Raisi for human rights violations
Exiled group accuses Iranian president of torture and murder in a 1988 crackdown on Iranian dissidents, urges US to take action ahead of his arrival in New York next month for UN
WASHINGTON — An exile group announced a New York lawsuit against Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi on Thursday, challenging US authorities to take action against him as he is expected to arrive next month for the UN General Assembly.
The National Council of Resistance of Iran said the suit accused Raisi of torture and murder in a 1988 crackdown on Iranian dissidents.
Echoing similar complaints filed in England and Scotland, the civil lawsuit says that in 1988 Raisi was a member of the so-called “death commission,” four judges who directly ordered thousands of executions as well as torture of members of the opposition People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, known as the MEK.
The MEK is the largest partner of the NCRI.
It is “beyond doubt that as deputy state prosecutor for Tehran province, Ebrahim Raisi, was a member of that death commission,” Steven Schneebaum, the lead attorney in the lawsuit, said in a Washington press conference organized by the NCRI.
The suit was filed in federal court in New York last week in the names of two people tortured at the time and a third person whose brother was executed.
#NoVisa4Raisi ⁰#ProsecuteRaisiNOW
Federal complaint against Ebrahim Raisi for Role in #1988MassacreRemarks by @SoonaSamsami, U.S. Representative, National Council of Resistance of #Iran @POTUS @SecBlinken@SFRCdems@SenateForeignhttps://t.co/HSm8WU0jA7
— NCRI-U.S. Rep Office (@NCRIUS) August 25, 2022
It cites Amnesty International and US sanctions declarations that accuse Raisi of complicity in the 1988 events.
The suit asks for unspecified damages for torture, extrajudicial killings, genocide and crimes against humanity.
It also challenges the notion that Raisi, who was elected president last year, enjoys immunity under US law as a head of state or official representative attending the annual UN meeting in New York.
Schneebaum said that Raisi is not a diplomat accredited to the United Nations and, while he is president, Iran’s real head of state is Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
“Raisi is not a diplomat… and is not eligible for the privileges extended under the Vienna Convention. Nor is he in fact a head of state,” Schneebaum said.
If US authorities accept those arguments, they could serve Raisi with a warrant if he attends the UN meetings in September. He would then be required to submit a plea within 21 days, said Schneebaum.
Asked about Raisi’s attendance, State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said that visa issues are “confidential under US law” but that the United States had obligations to let in foreign dignitaries.
“As host nation of the UN, the US is generally obligated under the UN Headquarters Agreement to issue visas to representatives of UN member states to travel to the UN headquarters district,” Patel told reporters.
The lawsuit comes as Iran and the United States move closer through indirect diplomacy to reviving a 2015 nuclear deal trashed by former president Donald Trump.
It is exceedingly rare for the United States to refuse entry to UN meetings. In 1988, Washington drew controversy by barring Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, prompting the General Assembly to convene in Geneva instead.