Republicans target Obama after Iran payout linked to hostage release
search

Republicans target Obama after Iran payout linked to hostage release

GOP says conditioning $400m for Tehran on freedom for US prisoners makes it a ransom; administration defends move as ‘leverage’

Senator Ben Sasse speaking in Las Vegas in July, 2016. (CC BY-SA Gage Skidmore, Flickr)
Senator Ben Sasse speaking in Las Vegas in July, 2016. (CC BY-SA Gage Skidmore, Flickr)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is facing a storm of Republican criticism after acknowledging that a $400 million cash payment to Iran seven months ago was contingent on the release of a group of American prisoners.

Thursday’s explanation was the first time the US had so clearly linked the two events, which critics have painted as a hostage-ransom arrangement.

Repeating past administration statements, State Department spokesman John Kirby said the negotiations to return the Iranian money from a 1970s account to buy US military equipment were conducted separately from talks to free four US citizens in Iran.

But unlike with past descriptions, he said the US withheld the delivery of the cash as leverage until Iran permitted the Americans to leave the country.

US State Department spokesman John Kirby briefs reporters on August 18, 2016. (screen capture/US State Department)
US State Department spokesman John Kirby briefs reporters on August 18, 2016. (screen capture/US State Department)

“We had concerns that Iran may renege on the prisoner release,” Kirby said, citing delays and mutual mistrust between countries that severed diplomatic relations 36 years ago. As a result, he explained, the US “of course sought to retain maximum leverage until after the American citizens were released. That was our top priority.”

Kirby said “it would have been foolish, imprudent, irresponsible” for the administration to have acted otherwise.

‘If a cash payment is contingent on a hostage release, it’s a ransom. The truth matters’

Both events occurred January 17, fueling suspicions from Republican lawmakers and accusations from GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump of a quid pro quo that undermined America’s longstanding opposition to ransom payments. Several members of Congress immediately pounced on Thursday’s shift.

“If it quacks like a duck, it’s a duck. If a cash payment is contingent on a hostage release, it’s a ransom. The truth matters and the president owes the American people an explanation,” Republican Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse said.

“Decisions like these are putting our nation and our allies at risk,” added North Carolina Republican Senator Richard Burr, the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman.

In a speech Thursday night in Charlotte, North Carolina, Trump accused President Barack Obama of lying. “He denied it was for the hostages, but it was. He said we don’t pay ransom, but he did. He lied about the hostages, openly and blatantly,” Trump said.

Kirby spoke a day after The Wall Street Journal reported new details of the crisscrossing planes on that day. US officials wouldn’t let Iran bring the cash home from a Geneva airport until a Swiss Air Force plane carrying three of the freed Americans departed from Tehran, the paper reported. The fourth American left on a commercial flight.

Earlier this month, after the revelation the US delivered the money in pallets of cash, the administration flatly denied any connection between the payment and the prisoners.

“Reports of link between prisoner release & payment to Iran are completely false,” Kirby tweeted at the time.

An unidentified man leaves a Dassault Falcon jet of Swiss army at the airport in Geneva, Switzerland, Sunday, January 17, 2016. (AP/Laurent Cipriani)
An unidentified man leaves a Dassault Falcon jet of Swiss army at the airport in Geneva, Switzerland, Sunday, January 17, 2016. (AP/Laurent Cipriani)

The money comes from an account used by the Iranian government to buy American military equipment in the days of the US-backed shah. The equipment was never delivered after the shah’s government was overthrown in 1979 and revolutionaries took American hostages at the US Embassy in Tehran. The two sides have wrangled over that account and numerous other financial claims ever since.

Obama has said his negotiators secured the US a good deal on a busy diplomatic weekend that also included finalizing the seven-nation nuclear accord. But he and other officials have consistently denied any linkages.

“We actually had diplomatic negotiations and conversations with Iran for the first time in several decades,” Obama said August 5, meaning “our ability to clear accounts on a number of different issues at the same time converged.”

“This wasn’t some nefarious deal,” he said.

The agreement was the return of the $400 million, plus an additional $1.3 billion in interest, terms that Obama described as favorable compared to what might have been expected from a tribunal set up in The Hague to rule on pending deals between the two countries. US officials have said they expected an imminent ruling on the claim and settled with Tehran instead.

Some Iranian officials immediately linked the payment to the release of four Americans, including Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, who had been held in Iranian prisons.

Another of the prisoners, pastor Saeed Abedini, also had linked the two events. He said that as the prisoners waited for hours at an airport to leave Iran, a senior Iranian intelligence official informed them their departure depended on the plane with the cash. US officials had pinned the delays on difficulties finding Rezaian’s wife and mother, and ensuring they could depart Iran with him.

“The administration clearly has a lot of explaining to do,” Representative Jeb Hensarling, the House Financial Services Committee chairman, said. Congress, he added, must “fully investigate this outrageous action.”

Join us!
A message from the Editor of Times of Israel
David Horovitz

For as little as $6 a month, you can help support our independent journalism — and enjoy special benefits and status as a Times of Israel Community member!

The Times of Israel covers one of the most complicated, and contentious, parts of the world. Determined to keep readers fully informed and enable them to form and flesh out their own opinions, The Times of Israel has gradually established itself as the leading source of independent and fair-minded journalism on Israel, the region and the Jewish world.

We've achieved this by investing ever-greater resources in our journalism while keeping all of the content on our site free.

Unlike many other news sites, we have not put up a paywall. But we would like to invite readers who can afford to do so, and for whom The Times of Israel has become important, to help support our journalism by joining The Times of Israel Community. Join now and for as little as $6 a month you can both help ensure our ongoing investment in quality journalism, and enjoy special status and benefits as a Times of Israel Community member.

Join our community
read more:
comments