Analysis

With Operation Epic Fury, Trump relies on Iranian people to finish the job

US officials make shaky argument Trump had no choice but to authorize Iran strikes. He did, but felt conditions were ripe for regime change — something that can’t be completed externally

Jacob Magid is The Times of Israel's US bureau chief

US President Donald Trump makes a fist after he steps off Air Force One upon arrival at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida on February 27, 2026. Trump is spending the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP)
US President Donald Trump makes a fist after he steps off Air Force One upon arrival at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida on February 27, 2026. Trump is spending the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort. (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP)

Briefing reporters on Saturday, a senior administration official tried to make the case that US President Donald Trump had “no choice” but to authorize Operation Epic Fury against Iran.

“The threat from Iran… in the short term is… the conventional missile capability,” he said of the decision to launch a military campaign against the Islamic Republic.

“We had indicators that they intended to use it potentially, preemptively… if not simultaneous [to] any actions against them,” the senior US official said.

Intelligence that Iran was about to strike could well have justified the US acting first, but the official’s own indecisiveness on the matter was difficult to ignore.

It harked back to Trump’s State of the Union speech days earlier, when the president appeared to give another justification for what then was only a theoretical strike on Iran.

“After [Operation] Midnight Hammer, they were warned to make no future attempts to rebuild their weapons program… Yet they continue starting it all over. We wiped it out, and they want to start all over again,” Trump said.

A smoke plume rises over Abu Dhabi from the site of an Iranian missile strike on February 28, 2026 (AFP)

There’s a difference between Iran rebuilding its nuclear program and merely wanting to do so, but Trump said both of those things.

Then, in his address to the nation moments after authorizing the strike, Trump phrased the justification a third way: “They attempted to rebuild their nuclear program” — not necessarily rebuilding the program, but trying to do so.

Those assertions were part of prepared remarks by the president in which he could be seen looking at the teleprompter — not off-the-cuff claims that could have been dismissed more easily.

Toward the end of his Saturday speech, Trump indicated there was an additional motivation for striking Iran that went beyond intelligence of a potential preemptive missile strike or the potential rebuilding of its nuclear program.

Appearing to push for regime change, Trump called on Iranians to “take over” their government.

People watch as smoke rises on the horizon after an explosion in Tehran, Iran, February 28, 2026. (AP Photo)

“Now is the time to seize control of your destiny and to unleash the prosperous and glorious future that is close within your reach,” he said.

It was an acknowledgement that, as much as the US could try to lay the groundwork for the regime to fall, it wouldn’t be able to finish the job on its own.

So Trump is betting on the Iranian people with Operation Epic Fury.

It could well be worth the gamble, given the weak and exposed state of the Islamic Republic after last year’s 12-day war and its latest brutal crackdown on Iranian civilians.

But it’s still a gamble.

US President Donald Trump announces US strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026. (Screen capture/Truth Social)

He faces a regime that prepared for this very scenario, including by putting contingency plans in place for who would make decisions in the event that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed, a senior Arab diplomat told The Times of Israel on Saturday hours after Khamenei’s death.

The regime knows that Trump wants Operation Epic Fury to wrap up quickly after having campaigned against getting the US become entrenched in Mideast conflicts.

“We will measure our success not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end, and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into,” Trump said to applause from his supporters in his inauguration speech just over a year ago.

He’s no longer personally campaigning, so that may explain his willingness to seemingly abandon that mantra in favor of addressing what he said in his Saturday speech was the “imminent” threat posed by Iran.

But his party may pay if fresh polling, indicating that just one in four Americans backs the US strikes on Iran, still holds come the November midterms.

Most Popular
read more:
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.