Government says High Court has no authority to force state inquiry into October 7

Responding to petitions by civil society groups, government’s lawyers say letting court order such a probe ‘would tear apart the principle of separation of powers’

Jeremy Sharon is The Times of Israel’s legal affairs and settlements reporter

Supreme Court President Isaac Amit arrives for a hearing at the High Court of Justice in Jerusalem, December 23, 2025. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)
Supreme Court President Isaac Amit arrives for a hearing at the High Court of Justice in Jerusalem, December 23, 2025. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

The government argued Sunday that the High Court of Justice has no authority to order it to establish a state commission of inquiry into failures surrounding the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, responding to civil society groups who have petitioned the court to do so.

The government asserted that the 1969 Law for Commissions of Inquiry explicitly gives the government, and no other body, including the court, the authority to establish such inquiries, and cited a 2021 decision by the court to back its argument.

In 2024, the Movement for Quality Government and other civil society groups asked the High Court to order the government to establish a state commission of inquiry into the October 7 attack. Such a commission is Israel’s highest investigative authority.

The High Court issued a conditional order against the government on November 19, 2025, asking it to explain why it was not establishing a state commission.

The government, in its response, wrote: “The authority in this matter belongs to the government and not to any other entity, and this honorable court has ruled in the clearest terms that ‘the establishment of a state committee of inquiry is a matter for the government to answer, not for the court.’”

“It should be said even now that making the conditional order absolute would tear apart the principle of separation of powers and would harm the balance established by the legislature, an injury that, with all due respect, is not within the authority of this honorable court,” the government asserted.

Bereaved families of the October 7 massacre attend a press conference calling for the establishment of a state commission of inquiry into the attack, December 24, 2025. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

The government is being represented in this case by private lawyers, rather than the attorney general, because the latter agrees with the petitioners.

The state cited a decision issued by the High Court in 2021 regarding requests by petitioners that it order the government to launch a state commission of inquiry into the Submarine Affair. That scandal revolved around allegations of a massive bribery scheme in Israel’s multi-billion-shekel purchase of naval vessels from German shipbuilder Thyssenkrupp.

In that case, the court noted that there was “improper and worrying conduct” that it said was deserving of further investigation, but it stopped short of ordering a probe.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes the formation of a state commission, and has resisted pressure to do so throughout the more than two years since the deadly Hamas onslaught. Netanyahu has claimed that, because a state commission is appointed by the judiciary – whose powers his government has sought to curb – it would be biased against the government.

Activists calling for a state commission of inquiry into the October 7, 2023, attack protest outside the home of Education Minister Yoav Kisch in Hod Hasharon, December 24, 2025. The signs read: ‘The nation demands a state commission of inquiry.’ (Tal Gal/Flash90)

Last month, the coalition voted in favor of a preliminary reading of a highly controversial bill sponsored by Likud MK Ariel Kallner to set up a politically appointed probe instead.

Kallner’s plan calls for a Knesset supermajority to appoint a six-member investigative committee and its chairman. If there is no agreement on the members after two weeks, both the opposition and coalition would be allowed to select three committee members each, who would be joined by four supervisory members representing bereaved families.

The proposal states that if either the coalition or opposition does not cooperate in the process or cannot settle on a candidate, the Knesset speaker will choose instead — giving the coalition effective control, as opposition figures have pledged to boycott the commission.

Critics have argued that such a commission will be highly politicized since all its members will have been selected by politicians who want to avoid being found responsible for the failures.

Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara has also panned the legislation, describing it as “tailor-made” for the “personal” needs of the government.

Most Popular
read more:
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.