Jared Kushner and Steven Mnuchin walk a fine line on the Saudi crown prince
search
Analysis

Jared Kushner and Steven Mnuchin walk a fine line on the Saudi crown prince

Treasury secretary’s meeting with Mohammed bin Salman and remarks by Trump’s son-in-law prompt scrutiny of White House response to Khashoggi killing

Ron Kampeas
White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, right, sits next to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin during the US-China Comprehensive Economic Dialogue, on July 19, 2017, at the Treasury Department in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, right, sits next to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin during the US-China Comprehensive Economic Dialogue, on July 19, 2017, at the Treasury Department in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

WASHINGTON (JTA) — Two of US President Donald Trump’s top advisers, son-in-law Jared Kushner and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, got caught up in the sensitivities of US-Saudi relations this week, and it didn’t go well.

In each case, the grisly killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi became an issue during an event where each adviser hoped to highlight a Trump administration positive: Kushner wanted to tout prison reform, while Mnuchin aimed to showcase an effort to enhance sanctions on Iran.

The Saudi regime, effectively led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, this week acknowledged that its agents killed Khashoggi, a dissident columnist who had angered the crown prince.

Trump condemned the killing and has said that he believes there was a Saudi cover-up — but will not implicate bin Salman, who Trump said has denied any role.

“I want to believe them. I really want to believe them,” he said.

US President Donald Trump shows a chart highlighting arms sales to Saudi Arabia during a meeting with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the Oval Office of the White House, March 20, 2018. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

What’s behind Trump’s ambiguity has become an international guessing game, although old-fashioned realpolitik appears to play a large part. Trump is candid about wanting to preserve a $110 billion military purchase by the Saudis, and his administration has courted the Saudis’ cooperation in containing Iran and supporting the US efforts toward Israeli-Palestinian peace.

That’s where Kushner and Mnuchin come in. Kushner has formed a close friendship with bin Salman, and as Bob Woodward reported in his book “Fear,” has been working to encourage an alliance between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Mnuchin is leading an effort to use sanctions to isolate Iran, seen as the principal regional threat to US interests and allies like Saudi Arabia and Israel. Both Kushner and Mnuchin are Jewish.

Kushner appeared this week in an interview at an invitation-only CNN forum with its liberal commentator Van Jones, who has praised the White House — and Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump particularly — for advocating prison reform. Kushner has been an advocate for prison reform ever since his father, Charles, did time for illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tampering.

Kushner is rarely available to the media and likes to choose softball events when he is — and this was supposed to be one. But Jones couldn’t avoid the Saudi issue.

“Do you trust the Saudis to investigate themselves?” Jones asked. “It seems like MBS is like the prime suspect and he’s also the prime investigator.” (MBS is a popular nickname for bin Salman.)

“We’re getting facts in from multiple places and then once those facts come in, the secretary of state will work with our national security team to help us determine what we want to believe,” Kushner said, “what we think is credible, and what we think is not credible.”

Jared Kushner alongside a member of the Saudi delegation at a White House meeting between US President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, March 20, 2018. (Kevin Dietsch/Pool/Getty Images via JTA)

Using facts to “determine what we want to believe” prompted a storm of derision on liberal media; Mother Jones made it the magazine’s quote of the day.

“Interesting phrasing,” Ned Price, a former Obama administration spokesman, said on Twitter. “And probably more accurate than Kushner intended.”

Soon after the Khashoggi affair broke, Mnuchin joined other leaders and media in withdrawing from a conference, Davos in the Desert, that was supposed to have highlighted Saudi investment. He would not remove Saudi Arabia from a planned Middle East tour, however, because of the importance he attaches to the Iran agenda. (Israel also was a stop.)

“To make clear @stevenmnuchin1 cancelled his speaking engagement at Saudi investment conference,” his spokesman, Tony Sayegh, said on Twitter. “He is in Saudi (as part of 6 country Middle East trip) visiting the Terrorist Financing Targeting Center and having meetings in preparation for Iran sanctions.”

That didn’t stop the Saudis from posting a photo on Twitter of Mnuchin and bin Salman meeting — and attaching to it the Davos in the Desert hashtag, #Vision30. The Saudi Foreign Ministry tweet also seemed to imply that the alliance with the United States should override other considerations.

“#CrownPrince meets with the US Secretary of the Treasury and stresses the importance of Saudi-US strategic partnership, where it holds an important role in the future in line with the Kingdom’s #Vision2030,” it said.

In this photo from October 22, 2018, released by the Saudi Press Agency, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, right, talks with the US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (Saudi Press Agency via AP)

As Mnuchin moved on to meetings with Israeli leaders in Jerusalem, critics questioned whether bin Salman deserved a high-level chat with an administration figure.

“If their talks were about financial matters, I certainly think they should not have gone forward,” Representative Adam Schiff of California, the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told The New York Times. “If they were about counterterrorism issues, it’s hard to believe how fruitful those could be.”

read more:
comments