New York Times clobbered for story on ‘polite’ Midwestern neo-Nazi

ADL head chides paper for ‘treating the abnormal as normal’ and others go to town over profile that even writer admits misfired

Illustrative photo of the New York Times building (Jonathan Torgovnik/Getty Images)
Illustrative photo of the New York Times building (Jonathan Torgovnik/Getty Images)

There’s an old journalism saying: If you are writing about a neo-Nazi in middle America, don’t make him seem like Wally Cleaver.

Okay, there’s not, but after the New York Times seemed to do just that Saturday, perhaps there should be.

A story published in the Gray Lady describing Dayton-area neo-Nazi Tony Hovater as “polite and low-key,” with “Midwestern manners [that] would please anyone’s mother,” kicked up an internet storm of rage over the weekend, with even writer Richard Fausset admitting that his piece was lacking.

Most took issue with the idea that Fausset seemed to be normalizing white supremacist attitudes with his profile of Hovater, following him to fast-casual restaurants like Applebee’s and Panera Bread and giving him a soapbox to spew anti-Semitic canards.

Anti-Defamation League head Jonathan Greenblatt chided the paper for “humanizing the inhumane.”

But mostly, it seemed it was the description of the “Seinfeld”-loving welder as a nice middle class Midwesterner, as American as apple pie (in the shape of a swastika) that inspired a whirlwind of indignant internet anger.

“You know who had nice manners? The Nazi who shaved my uncle Willie’s head before escorting him into a cement chamber where he locked eyes with children as their lungs filled with poison and they suffocated to death in agony. Too much? Exactly. That’s how you write about Nazis,” wrote comedy writer Bess Kalb in a Twitter rant for the ages.

Some pointed out the Times’s much less sympathetic description of a unarmed man shot and killed by the police in the same edition.

In a followup published for Sunday’s paper, Fausset admitted that the story failed to answer its main conceit, namely, “why did this man — intelligent, socially adroit and raised middle class amid the relatively well-integrated environments of United States military bases — gravitate toward the furthest extremes of American political discourse?”

“What I had were quotidian details,” he wrote, “though to be honest, I’m not even sure what these add up to.”

read more:
Never miss breaking news on Israel
Get notifications to stay updated
You're subscribed
Register for free
and continue reading
Registering also lets you comment on articles and helps us improve your experience. It takes just a few seconds.
Already registered? Enter your email to sign in.
Please use the following structure:
Or Continue with
By registering you agree to the terms and conditions. Once registered, you’ll receive our Daily Edition email for free.
Register to continue
Or Continue with
Log in to continue
Sign in or Register
Or Continue with
check your email
Check your email
We sent an email to you at .
It has a link that will sign you in.