State Department officials said Sunday that a number of Arab countries have expressed willingness to launch airstrikes against jihadists of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, the New York Times reported.
“There have been offers both to Centcom [the US Department of Defense Central Command] and to the Iraqis of Arab countries taking more aggressive kinetic action,” an official said.
“I don’t want to leave you with the impression that these Arab members haven’t offered to do airstrikes because several of them have,” the official said. “The Iraqis would have to be a major participant in that decision. It has to be well structured and organized.”
Another official said that in addition to the airstrikes, there are various ways Arab countries could contribute to the efforts to combat the jihadists.
“Providing arms could be contributing to the military campaign,” the official said. “Any sort of training activity would be contributing to the military campaign.”
The officials Sunday also expressed reservations about the Iraqi air force, stating that their accuracy was lacking and was liable to cause civilian casualties.
“They have a very new air force,” an official said. “Their targeting is not nearly as precise as ours and they have made some real mistakes.”
The White House said Sunday it will find countries willing to send combat troops to fight Islamic extremists in Syria and Iraq, but it’s too early to identify them.
White House chief of staff Denis McDonough signaled that the State Department in coming days will name allies that will pledge ground troops to fight the Islamic State group, something the United States does not plan to do. In the meantime, McDonough said, US personnel will train and equip Iraqi forces and moderate Syrian rebels to combat the extremist group, also known as ISIS and ISIL.
President Barack Obama announced Wednesday that the United States will ramp up air strikes and try to build an international coalition to degrade and eventually destroy the group. The Islamic State group released a video late Saturday showing a militant beheading a British aid worker. It was similar to recent beheadings of two American journalists.
Facing strong public opposition to sending US troops back into the Middle East, Obama said he doesn’t plan to do so. But he said ground troops of some form are essential, a point McDonough was asked about on several talk shows Sunday.
McDonough repeatedly declined to name any nations willing to provide ground forces, and he was cautious in suggesting what might develop.
On NBC television’s “Meet the Press,” McDonough said Secretary of State John Kerry “over the coming days” will discuss whether any allied nation has pledged ground troops. “And what he has said is that others have suggested that they’re willing to do that,” McDonough said.
Pressed again on possible pledges of combat troops, McDonough seemed slightly less hesitant. “You will hear from Secretary Kerry that countries are saying that they’re ready to do that,” he said.
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbot said Sunday his nation is preparing to contribute 600 troops and up to 10 military aircraft to the campaign against the Islamic State group extremists.
For the last week, Kerry has traveled across the Mideast, to Turkey and finally Paris, to pin down nations on what kind of support they will give to a global coalition. But Kerry has refused to detail what countries have committed. He said some nations are still deciding whether their contributions will target foreign fighters or financiers helping the militant group, send more humanitarian aid to Syrian and Iraqi refugees, mount a propaganda campaign to decry the extremists’ brand of radical Islam or join a military mission.
Kerry cited reports that France is prepared to use air power against the Islamic militants. On Monday, Paris will host international talks seeking a strategy against the militants in Iraq, where they have overrun vast swaths of territory in the country’s north and west.
But the militant group’s safe haven is in Syria, among numerous Sunni rebel factions that have fought for more than three years to unseat President Bashar Assad.
Republican Rep. Michael McCaul suggested Sunday that enlisting greater help from Mideast allies might not be so difficult. McCaul, who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee, told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that he recently met “with the prince of Jordan,” who “said he is ready today to put his troops into Syria to fight ISIS. So I don’t know why we wouldn’t consider that option of all the Arab nations.” McCaul’s staff said he was referring to Prince Feisal Bin Al-Hussein.
Congress plans votes, possibly this week, on Obama’s request for authority to train and equip moderate Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic militants in Syria. Leaders of both parties have generally expressed support for the plan.
But some lawmakers worry that US arms given to Syrian rebels might wind up being used against Americans or their allies in that violence-torn nation enduring a three-way war.
“I don’t think arming the rebels in this instance is necessarily going to be productive,” Democratic Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand said on “Face the Nation.”
“We spent years training the Iraqi forces,” Gillibrand said, “and ISIS was able to cut through them like butter.”
McDonough, on “Fox News Sunday,” defended the idea of training and arming Syrian rebels. Since the U.S. is not sending ground troops, he said, “we ought to make sure that the Syrians are taking this fight, which is their fight, to ISIL.”
Kerry is scheduled to testify to congressional committees Wednesday and Thursday. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel will address the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday.