Modern political campaigns often divide voters into homogeneous groups for purposes of advertising and persuasion, and Israel is no different. The “Russian” vote stems from the large wave of immigration to Israel from countries of the former Soviet Union and is homogenous in many ways.
Immigrants to Israel since 1989 from these countries self-identify as 77% secular and 21% traditional in their religiosity. They are largely right wing voters, with 31% identifying as right and 31% as center right.
The Russian vote cannot be discussed without mentioning Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, chairman of the Yisrael Beytenu party. Likely voters’ perception of Liberman has soured significantly over the past year, unsurprisingly, given that Yisrael Beytenu is mired in a major corruption scandal.
In the Times of Israel survey conducted in January of 2014, 41% of likely voters had a favorable impression of Liberman and 50% had an unfavorable impression of him. Now, his favorable rating has fallen to 31% while his unfavorable rating has risen to 61%. What was once a perception that tilted 9 points negatively now tilts 30 points negatively. This, despite the fact that Liberman has not himself been implicated in the corruption case.
If it was the Russian vote that caused Liberman’s rise to power in Israeli politics, it is the same Russian vote that is helping his fall. True, Liberman remains popular within this community despite the overall negative perception among all likely voters, with 66% of Russians giving him a favorable rating and 25% giving him a negative rating.
This popularity, however, is far lower than the Times of Israel poll conducted in January 2014, which showed Liberman with 85% favorable and 13% unfavorable views within this community. This is a serious collapse among his base group of supporters and certainly fueled his declining favorability among all voters.
Liberman’s waning popularity among Russians group has lead to a hemorrhaging of Russian voters from his party, Yisrael Beytenu. Just a year ago, when Liberman was 85% favorable among Russian voters, two thirds said that they would vote for Likud-Beytenu and 23% were undecided.
Today, after Liberman split from his alliance with Likud, more than two-thirds of Russian voters say they are not voting Yisrael Beytenu, while just 30% say they will, and another 32% say they are undecided. The combined vote intention of Yisrael Beytenu and Likud of 46% is a steep fall in just one year from the 64% vote intention to these parties when they were combined. As such, the rate of undecideds is higher among Russians than across the broader population of likely voters, where 24% are undecided.
With 86% of Yisrael Beytenu voters identifying as Russian voters, 6 of the 7 Knesset seats the data suggests Liberman’s party will receive are Russian. If Liberman wants to get closer to the 13 seats his party has in Knesset today, he will have to go back to his base and bring the undecided Russian voters back home to Yisrael Beytenu.
The survey was conducted February 1-3, 2015, among a representative sample of 824 Israeli adults who indicated that they were very likely or somewhat likely to vote in the upcoming Knesset elections. Respondents who indicated that they were less likely or not at all likely to vote were not included in the survey sample. 44.7% of completed surveys were directed to landline home phones, 33.5% to mobile phones, and 21.9% were conducted via online panels, helping to compensate for the high percentage of Israelis who do not have regular landline phones. 10.1% of respondents were Arabic speakers surveyed in Arabic, and 10.9% were Russian speakers surveyed in Russian. The findings are rounded to the nearest whole digit. The margin of error is +/-3.41% with a 95% confidence level.
This is the fourth in a series of articles that The Times of Israel is publishing on the basis of the poll. The survey was formulated by The Times of Israel and the author, from political consultancy firm 202 Strategies. Our survey is the most accurate publicly available poll to date, having questioned a relatively large sample of 824 likely voters — as opposed to the Hebrew media’s norm of 500 eligible voters.
Stephan Miller, cited by Campaigns and Elections magazine in 2008 as “James Carville’s young protégé,” is an American-Israeli public opinion research analyst and communications strategist and a former adviser to Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat who has worked on campaigns in 10 countries across four continents.
Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage right now? If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6/month, you will:
We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.
That’s why we started the Times of Israel eleven years ago - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.
So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.
For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.
David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel
- Israel Inside
- Times of Israel poll
- Benjamin Netanyahu
- Isaac Herzog
- Likud party
- 2015 Israeli elections
- Yesh Atid party
- Zionist Union
- Kulanu party
- Yisrael Beytenu party
- Shas party
- Tzipi Livni
- Yair Lapid
- Moshe Kahlon
- Iran's nuclear program
- Iran nuclear deal
- Avigdor Liberman
- Ra'am party (United Arab List)