Iran looks at compromise nuke deal, says won’t seek talks extension
search

Iran looks at compromise nuke deal, says won’t seek talks extension

Diplomats say Tehran mulling offer to keep infrastructure but reduce ability to make bomb; FM says sanctions have ‘no effect’ on nuclear program

Police guard in front of Hotel Palais Coburg during closed-door nuclear talks in Vienna, Austria, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2014. EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif continue their nuclear talks in an effort to meet the target date of Nov. 24, but with less than six weeks left, there may be no alternative than to prolonging them. (photo credit: AP/Ronald Zak)
Police guard in front of Hotel Palais Coburg during closed-door nuclear talks in Vienna, Austria, Thursday, Oct. 16, 2014. EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif continue their nuclear talks in an effort to meet the target date of Nov. 24, but with less than six weeks left, there may be no alternative than to prolonging them. (photo credit: AP/Ronald Zak)

Iran is considering a US proposal at nuclear talks that would allow it to keep more of its nuclear infrastructure intact while still reducing its ability to make an atomic bomb, two diplomats told The Associated Press on Thursday.

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said that Tehran does not want to extend its nuclear talks with world powers beyond a November 24 deadline.

“We only have 40 days left to the deadline and also none of the negotiators find [an] extension of talks as appropriate. We share this view… and we think there is no need to even think about it,” Zarif said on the sidelines of talks in Vienna, as quoted by the website of state television.

Zarif said the sanctions “have had no effect” on Tehran’s development of its nuclear program.

US Secretary of State John Kerry (L), European Union High Representative Catherine Ashton, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif are photographed as they participate in a trilateral meeting in Vienna, Austria, on October 15, 2014. (Photo credit: AFP/ POOL / CAROLYN KASTER)
US Secretary of State John Kerry (L), European Union High Representative Catherine Ashton, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif are photographed as they participate in a trilateral meeting in Vienna, Austria, on October 15, 2014. (Photo credit: AFP/ POOL / CAROLYN KASTER)

“Sanctions are a symbol of a past relationship, and this symbol should be broken. That’s why we are putting the emphasis on [lifting] them.”

At issue is Iran’s uranium enrichment program, which can make both reactor fuel and the fissile core of nuclear arms. Tehran insists the program is only for future energy needs. Iran is refusing US demands that it cut the number of working enriching centrifuges from nearly 10,000 to only a few thousand. That dispute has been the main stumbling block to progress since the talks began early this year.

Ahead of a Nov. 24 deadline to seal a deal, diplomats told the AP last month that US had begun floating alternates to reducing centrifuges that would eliminate the disagreement but still accomplish the goal of increasing the time Iran would need to make a nuclear weapon.

Among them was an offer to tolerate more centrifuges if Tehran agreed to reduce its stockpile of low-enriched uranium, which can fuel reactors but is also easily turned into weapons-grade material.

Back then, Iran was non-committal. But the two diplomats said Thursday it recently began discussions with Moscow on possibly shipping some of its low-enriched stockpile to Russia for future use as an energy source. Russia supplies fuel for Iran’s existing nuclear reactor.

The diplomats demanded anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss confidential information. They stressed the discussions were preliminary and Iran had made no commitment.

Iranian officials at the closed talks were not reachable for comment.

Experts say the low-enriched uranium Iran has stored, if further enriched, could arm up to seven nuclear weapons. They estimate it would take Tehran between 3-to-12 months to have enough weapons-grade uranium for one bomb.

read more:
comments