A member of the Austrian branch of the Rothschild family is suing the city of Vienna, accusing it of “perpetuating” Nazi laws by plundering the Jewish banking family’s foundation.
The Financial Times reported that the dispute — over the long-forgotten charitable trust set up to provide psychiatric help — is one of the largest-ever restitution claims by Nazi regime victims’ descendants.
Austria’s Kurier daily and Profil magazine carried similar reports on the case, for which a Vienna district court hearing has been set on February 20.
Vienna “has acted as if the Nazi confiscation decrees were still in place,” according to the reported court filings by the lawyer of Geoffrey Hoguet, the great-grandson of Albert von Rothschild who had set up a foundation to commemorate his younger brother of Nathaniel Freiherr von Rothschild.
Rothschild — a member of the Austria branch of the wealthy family originally from Frankfurt — left the equivalent of about 100 million euros ($110 million) when he died in 1905 to provide psychiatric help for the needy in the name of his brother, an advocate of psychiatric treatments.
The foundation set up in his name and initially managed by a 12-member committee led by the Rothschild family ended up running two sanatoriums — the first, opened in 1912, still operates today as a neurological center.
The Nazis annexed Austria in 1938, expelled the Rothschilds in that year and disbanded the foundation in 1939.
After World War II, in 1956, it was re-established and managed by the city of Vienna, no longer under a 12-member committee.
Hoguet — a prominent investor from New York and financial supporter of Democratic Party presidential nominee Pete Buttigieg — now says an independent management committee should be put in place again.
He has accused the city of appropriating the foundation in breach of its founder’s will, according to the reports.
The 69-year-old also wants to nullify the sale of one of the sanatoriums in the early 2000s — a late-baroque palace that was reportedly one of the world’s earliest centers of mental health treatment.
He alleges it was sold at a “grossly undervalued” price to the city, according to the Financial Times.
Hoguet’s court case also aims to nullify a 2017 clause that determines that if the foundation were dissolved its wealth would go to the city of Vienna.
“[The City of Vienna] has essentially rewritten a will to make itself the main heir, and in effect, has done by guile what had been done in 1938 by brute force,” Hoguet and his cousins told the FT. “The city’s actions represent a grievous case of self-dealing, possibly the most cynical and corrupt in the history of aryanization and restitution in post war Austria.”
A lawyer for the city of Vienna said in a statement that agreements regarding the foundation were made decades ago with “the greatest respect and absolutely in line with the foundation’s purpose.”
It is not the first case highlighting Austria’s dealing with its past.
In 2016, Vienna’s famous Leopold Museum settled a long-running dispute over five Nazi-plundered drawings by Austrian painter Egon Schiele with the descendants of the works’ Jewish former owner.
Since Austria passed a law in 1998 covering the restitution of vast numbers of artworks stolen by the Nazis, thousands have been returned — including major works worth millions of euros.