Choosing the list of candidates for parliament is one of the key activities of political parties. The methods by which these lists are determined may affect critical democratic values, such as competition, representation, and participation. The methods may also influence the behavior of legislators, and have an impact, for example, on party cohesion and party discipline.
Parties in Israel employ a variety of methods in determining their lists of candidates. In some parties, the list is created as a result of primaries — elections in which all registered party members or even all of the party’s supporters determine the list. Ahead of April’s elections, the Likud, Labor and Meretz parties are all using versions of primaries to choose their candidates for the Knesset.
An argument can be made that the more democratic the process, the better the system — but “primaries” as we know them today in Israel include many deficiencies. Among the shortcomings of this system are the high possibility for corruption due to the funding needed for campaigns, a disproportionate amount of power for interest groups, and an increased likelihood of voter fraud.
In other parties, the party leadership determines the list. The candidates of the Yesh Atid party, for example, are determined by the party’s founder and leader Yair Lapid. Similarly, the Yisrael Beytenu list is created in accordance with the desires of a council and Avigdor Liberman, the leader of that party. In the ultra-Orthodox parties such as Shas and United Torah Judaism, a “Council of Torah Sages” chooses the slate.
Beyond this, however, there are more open bodies within Israeli parties that participate in determining the party lists. In some parties, the list is determined by a small group of party elite, as in the case of “appointment committees,” which are also called “nomination committees.” This is the method that the Jewish Home party will likely be using in order to determine its slate for the upcoming election.
In still other parties, the party list is established by means of an internal election conducted within a party institution, such as a congress or a council, with delegates chosen by the party members.
One alternative would be for Israel to implement the semi-open ballot in general elections. When people come to vote on Election Day, they would select the party of their choice, and then be given the opportunity to mark or rank its preferred candidates. This way, they would determine not only which parties entered the Knesset, but who the members of Knesset would be.
Related blog post: It’s time to change how we select Knesset candidates
I’ll tell you the truth: Life here in Israel isn’t always easy. But it's full of beauty and meaning.
I'm proud to work at The Times of Israel alongside colleagues who pour their hearts into their work day in, day out, to capture the complexity of this extraordinary place.
I believe our reporting sets an important tone of honesty and decency that's essential to understand what's really happening in Israel. It takes a lot of time, commitment and hard work from our team to get this right.
Your support, through membership in The Times of Israel Community, enables us to continue our work. Would you join our Community today?
Sarah Tuttle Singer, New Media Editor
We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.
That’s why we come to work every day - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.
So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.
For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.