N. Korea: We don’t threaten, but we’ll wipe out US
search
Love the bombLove the bomb

N. Korea: We don’t threaten, but we’ll wipe out US

International experts continue to dismiss Pyongyang's claim that it detonated a miniaturized thermonuclear bomb

People watch a news report on North Korea's purported first hydrogen bomb test at a railroad station in Seoul on January 6, 2016. (AFP Photo/Jung Yeon-Je)
People watch a news report on North Korea's purported first hydrogen bomb test at a railroad station in Seoul on January 6, 2016. (AFP Photo/Jung Yeon-Je)

SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea said Tuesday its nuclear test was not intended to be a provocation or threat, as it laid out plans for a weapons system capable of obliterating the entire United States.

A lengthy commentary by the official KCNA news agency underlined the North’s claim that last Wednesday’s test was of a powerful miniaturized hydrogen bomb which marked a “new high stage” in the country’s search for a credible nuclear deterrent.

Experts have largely dismissed the claim, saying the test yield was far too low for a full-fledged thermonuclear device and was similar to the simple fission implosion devices it has tested three times in the past.

The KCNA commentary said the test was an indispensable stage on the “normal course” which other countries have taken to the development of a two-stage fission-fusion H-bomb.

“The test was neither to ‘threaten’ anyone, nor to ‘provoke’ someone for a certain purpose,” KCNA said, insisting that the main focus was on providing a “sure guarantee” of the North’s immunity from attack by hostile forces.

Prime among those forces was the United States, it said, offering an apocalyptic vision of how it would respond to US aggression.

North Korean scientists and technicians “are in high spirit to detonate H-bombs of hundreds of kilotons and megatons, capable of wiping out the whole territory of the US all at once,” it said.

Outside experts say the yield from Wednesday’s test was around six kilotons, while an H-bomb would have been at least 100 times more powerful.

read more:
comments