Nuclear agency tells Iran to explain uranium particles at site flagged by Israel
search

Nuclear agency tells Iran to explain uranium particles at site flagged by Israel

With radioactive material found at location said to be the compound Netanyahu brought to world attention, IAEA says it is ‘essential’ that Tehran help resolve matter

Iran's alleged atomic warehouse in Turquzabad, Tehran. (YouTube screenshot)
Iran's alleged atomic warehouse in Turquzabad, Tehran. (YouTube screenshot)

VIENNA, Austria (AFP) — The UN nuclear watchdog on Thursday urged Iran to explain the presence of uranium particles at an undeclared site, as a landmark deal aimed at curbing Tehran’s atomic activities threatens to collapse.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a report seen by AFP last week that its inspectors had “detected natural uranium particles of anthropogenic origin at a location in Iran not declared to the agency.”

The agency’s acting head Cornel Feruta said IAEA and Iranian officials would meet in Tehran next week to discuss the matter, adding that the UN body had not received any additional information.

“The matter remains unresolved… It is essential that Iran works with the agency to resolve this matter promptly,” he said at a meeting of the agency’s board of governors.

A diplomatic source told AFP that the IAEA would send a high-ranking technical delegation to Iran next week.

The particles are understood to be the product of uranium which has been mined and undergone initial processing, but not enriched.

While the IAEA has not named the site in question, diplomatic sources have previously said the agency asked Iran about a site in the Turquzabad district of Tehran where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has alleged secret atomic activity in the past.

Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the United Nations General Assembly on September 27, 2018, in New York City, and holds up a picture of what he said was a secret Iranian nuclear warehouse. (John Moore/Getty Images/AFP)

Sources say the IAEA took samples from the site in the spring and that Iran has been slow in providing answers to explain the test results.

US ambassador to the IAEA Jackie Wolcott called the matter, which has occupied the IAEA since January, “profoundly concerning.”

“That Iran has failed to sufficiently address this issue for close to a year is wholly unacceptable,” she said in her statement to the board.

Acting Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Cornel Feruta, addresses the media during a news conference after a meeting of the IAEA board of governors at the International Center in Vienna, Austria, September 9, 2019. (Ronald Zak/AP)

The 2015 deal between Iran and world powers has been faltering since last year when the United States pulled out and started to reinstate punishing sanctions on Tehran, leaving the other signatories struggling to salvage the agreement.

Over the past few months, Iran has breached several parts of the deal it signed with the US as well as Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia, in which it committed to scaling back its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

But Britain, France and Germany have said they are extremely concerned by Iran’s actions in stepping up its uranium enrichment and other breaches.

Enrichment is the process that produces fuel for nuclear power plants but also, in highly extended form, the fissile core for a warhead.

On Monday, the IAEA confirmed Iran’s stock of heavy water for reactors has surpassed the 130-ton limit set under the agreement.

Heavy water is not itself radioactive but is used in nuclear reactors to absorb neutrons from nuclear fission.

Heavy water reactors can be used to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons as an alternative to enriched uranium.

The IAEA has also said one of its inspectors was briefly prevented from leaving Iran, calling her treatment “not acceptable.”

Iran has cancelled the inspector’s accreditation, saying she triggered a security check at the entrance gate to the Natanz enrichment plant last month.

The IAEA has disputed the Iranian account of the incident, without going into details.

read more:
comments