NY Appeals Court: Chupah qualifies as a structure

The court ruled in favor of Samuel McCoy, who sued his florist employer and a catering hall after he fell from a ladder while taking apart a wedding canopy

NEW YORK (JTA) — A New York Appeals Court ruled that the chupah referenced in a 3-year-old lawsuit qualified as a structure.

The ruling Wednesday by the New York Appellate Division, Second Department, said that the chupah identified in a 2009 lawsuit meets the definition of a structure under New York’s so-called Scaffold Law, Reuters reported. The chupah is a canopy used in a Jewish wedding ceremony.

The court ruled in favor of Samuel McCoy, who sued his florist employer and a catering hall after he fell from a ladder while taking apart a chupah. It is not known how much in damages McCoy sought in his suit.

The Scaffold Law requires that employers protect workers from on-the-job injuries incurred from falls.

The Appeals Court judges agreed that not all chupahs would be considered a structure, that some are merely decorative. But the one referenced in the lawsuit included “various interconnected pipes secured to steel metal bases supporting the canopy,” they said.

Most Popular
read more:
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.