Despite divisions, UK set to vote for Syria air strikes
search

Despite divisions, UK set to vote for Syria air strikes

Britain could join anti-IS bombing campaign within hours of Wednesday’s vote; Corbyn slams ‘ill thought-out rush to war’

Illustrative: Opposition Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, stands right, as he makes a speech to lawmakers inside the House of Commons in London as Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron sits at center left, during a debate on launching airstrikes against Islamic State extremists inside Syria, December 2, 2015. (Photo by Parliamentary Recording Unit via AP Video)
Illustrative: Opposition Labour Party leader, Jeremy Corbyn, stands right, as he makes a speech to lawmakers inside the House of Commons in London as Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron sits at center left, during a debate on launching airstrikes against Islamic State extremists inside Syria, December 2, 2015. (Photo by Parliamentary Recording Unit via AP Video)

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s parliament looks set to vote in favor of joining air strikes on Islamic State jihadists in Syria on Wednesday, despite angry exchanges which have exposed deep divisions on military action.

British Prime Minister David Cameron kicked off over 10 hours of debate by urging MPs to “answer the call” from allies like France and the US, adding that bombing the “medieval monsters” of IS was “the right thing to do.”

“The question is this: do we work with our allies to degrade and destroy this threat… or do we sit back and wait for them to attack us?” he told the House of Commons.

Ministers and sources in the main opposition Labour party believe Cameron will win the vote expected at around 22:30 GMT (00:30 Israel time), paving the way for Britain to join airstrikes on Syria within days or even hours.

But many of the MPs crammed on to the Commons’ benches and walkways spoke against air strikes while thousands of anti-war protesters are expected to protest outside parliament later for the second night running.

A protester holds a placard reading 'Don't attack Syria' during a demonstration against British military action in Syria outside the Houses of Parliament in London, December 1, 2015. (Photo by AFP Photo / Leon Neal)
A protester holds a placard reading ‘Don’t attack Syria’ during a demonstration against British military action in Syria outside the Houses of Parliament in London, December 1, 2015. (Photo by AFP Photo / Leon Neal)

A new opinion poll Wednesday suggested that public support for joining air strikes in Syria had dropped significantly in recent days.

A YouGov poll in The Times newspaper found that 48 percent of Britons supported Syria strikes compared to 59 percent last week.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who opposes military action, condemned Cameron’s “ill thought-out rush to war” and said his proposals “simply do not stack up”.

“The specter of Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya looms over this debate,” Corbyn added, referring to unpopular British interventions in foreign conflicts over the last 15 years.

Cameron urged MPs not to let the memory of Iraq – which many Britons believe a Labour government under Tony Blair led them into using “sexed up” evidence on weapons of mass destruction – to dictate their decision.

“This is not 2003. We must not use past mistakes as an excuse for indifference or inaction,” he added.

The prime minister faced repeated calls during a raucous debate to apologize after reportedly telling Conservative MPs not to vote with “a bunch of terrorist sympathizers” against the strikes.

US urges more support

Cameron has wanted to extend Britain’s role in the fight against IS for months but made a fresh push which led to the vote after last month’s Paris attacks which killed 130 people.

British Prime Minister David Cameron leaves 10 Downing Street in central London ahead of a debate and vote in the House of Commons on joining the bombing campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria, December 2, 2015. (Photo by AFP Photo/Justin Tallis)
British Prime Minister David Cameron leaves 10 Downing Street in central London ahead of a debate and vote in the House of Commons on joining the bombing campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria, December 2, 2015. (Photo by AFP Photo/Justin Tallis)

Britain already has eight Tornado fighter jets plus drones involved in the US-led coalition striking IS targets in Iraq. However, it currently only conducts surveillance and intelligence missions over Syria.

The government will deploy more jets if the bombing is approved and argues that the Royal Air Force’s Brimstone missiles will be particularly valuable for precision strikes to avoid civilian casualties.

US Secretary of State John Kerry praised Cameron for bringing the vote to parliament Wednesday and urged all NATO countries to “step up support” for the fight against IS.

Military experts question how much difference Britain would make to the campaign, saying it may be more about wanting to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with allies like France and the United States.

Cameron again stressed that British ground forces will not be deployed to Syria as part of the action Wednesday, saying that would be a “mistake”.

‘Lost the argument’?

Labour is deeply divided on air strikes.

Corbyn opposes the move but has let his party have a free vote on the issue because dozens of his MPs, including his foreign and defense spokespeople, want to support it.

A Labour source speaking on condition of anonymity said he expected around 40 of its MPs to support the bombing.

“It’s expected that the government will win this vote… but it’s definitely lost the argument,” another Labour source added.

As well as Labour and the next biggest Commons grouping, the Scottish National Party, a handful of lawmakers from Cameron’s own Conservative party also oppose joining air strikes.

Cameron also fleshed out his claim that there were 70,000 moderate opposition fighters in Syria ready to help fight against IS.

He said these were mostly members of the rebel Free Syrian Army but added there were 20,000 Kurdish forces ready to contribute.

He conceded that, while they were not “ideal partners” and “some of them do have views that we don’t agree with”, they could “play a role” in the future of Syria.

read more:
comments