A look at Israel’s postwar Gaza options as Hamas attempts to regroup
Israel needs to make hard choices as to who will run the Strip after the war, with few good options to be found
Diminished but not deterred, Hamas is still putting up a fight after seven brutal months of war with Israel, regrouping in some of the hardest-hit areas in northern Gaza and resuming rocket attacks into nearby Israeli communities.
Israel initially made tactical advances against Hamas after powerful aerial strikes paved the way for its ground troops. But those early gains have given way to a grinding struggle against an adaptable insurgency — and a growing feeling among many Israelis that their military faces only bad options, drawing comparisons with US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This was the subtext of a rebellion in recent days by two members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s three-man war cabinet — Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Benny Gantz, Netanyahu’s main political rival — who demanded that he come up with detailed postwar plans.
They supported Israel’s military response to Hamas’s October 7 cross-border attack, which killed 1,200 people and saw 252 people abducted to the Gaza Strip. The operation, aimed at toppling the Hamas regime in Gaza, destroying the terror group, and freeing the hostages has seen one of the heaviest bombing campaigns in recent history. Ground operations have cost the lives of 286 Israeli soldiers in Gaza and along the border with the Palestinian enclave.
The fighting, which has pitched Israeli forces against Hamas gunmen embedded in civilian infrastructure — including hospitals and schools — has caused widespread devastation, disrupted humanitarian aid deliveries and, according to the UN’s World Food Program, pushed parts of the territory into famine.
But now Gallant and Gantz, both retired generals, fear a prolonged, costly reoccupation of Gaza, from which Israel withdrew all its soldiers and settlers in 2005. They are also opposed to a withdrawal that would leave Hamas in control or lead to the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu and his government have long faced criticism over their refusal to make a plan for the management of the Strip after the war, and the prime minister has refused to hold substantive cabinet discussions on the matter due to concerns they could collapse his coalition amid opposition from the far-right.
IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi also reportedly tore into Netanyahu during security consultations earlier this month for failing to develop and announce a so-called “day after” strategy.
Here’s a look at four ways this war might end.
Full-scale military occupation
Netanyahu has promised a “total victory” that would remove Hamas from power, dismantle its military capabilities and return the scores of hostages it still holds since the attack that triggered the war.
He has said victory could come within weeks if Israel launches a full-scale invasion of Rafah, which Israel describes as the last Hamas stronghold.
Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli general and former deputy commander of the Gaza division, says that’s only the beginning. He said Israel would need to remain in control to prevent Hamas from regrouping.
“If you don’t drain the swamp, you cannot deal with the mosquitoes. And drain the swamp means a complete change in the education system, and dealing with local leadership and not with a terror organization,” he said. “This is a generational process. It’s not going to happen in a day.”
Far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition, who hold the key to his remaining in power, have called for permanent occupation, “voluntary emigration” of large numbers of Palestinians to anywhere that will have them, and rebuilding of Jewish settlements in Gaza.
Most Israelis are opposed, pointing to the immense costs of stationing thousands of troops in the territory that is home to 2.3 million Palestinians. As an occupying power, Israel would likely be held responsible for providing health, education and other services. It’s unclear to what extent international donors would step in to fund reconstruction amid ongoing hostilities.
There’s also no guarantee such an occupation would eliminate Hamas.
Israel was in full control of Gaza when Hamas was established in the late 1980s. Israel’s 18-year presence of southern Lebanon coincided with the rise of Iran-backed terror group Hezbollah, and Israeli troops routinely battle terrorists in the West Bank, which it has controlled since 1967.
A lighter occupation, aided by ‘unicorns’
Netanyahu has said Israel will maintain security control over Gaza but delegate civilian administration to local Palestinians unaffiliated with Hamas or the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank. He has suggested that Arab and other countries assist with governance and rebuilding.
But so far, none have shown interest.
No Palestinians are known to have offered to cooperate with the Israeli military, perhaps because Hamas has said they would be treated as collaborators, a veiled death threat.
Efforts to reach out to Palestinian businessmen and powerful families “have ended in catastrophe,” says Michael Milshtein, an Israeli analyst of Palestinian affairs at Tel Aviv University and a former military intelligence officer.
He says Israelis seeking such allies are searching for “unicorns” — something that does not exist.
Arab states have also roundly rejected this scenario — even the United Arab Emirates, which is one of the few to formally recognize Israel and has close ties with it.
“The UAE refuses to be involved in any plan aimed at providing cover for the Israeli presence in the Gaza Strip,” Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan said this month.
A grand bargain
Instead, Arab states have coalesced around a US proposal aimed at resolving the decades-old conflict and transforming the Middle East.
Under this plan, a reformed Palestinian Authority would govern Gaza with the assistance of Arab and Muslim nations, including Saudi Arabia, which would normalize relations with Israel in return for a US defense pact and help in building a civilian nuclear program.
But US and Saudi officials say that hinges on Israel committing to a credible path to eventual Palestinian statehood.
Netanyahu has ruled out such a scenario — as have Gallant and Gantz — saying it would reward Hamas and result in a terror-run state on Israel’s borders.
Palestinians say ending Israel’s decades-long control and creating a fully independent state in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem — territories Israel won in the 1967 Six Day War as Arab countries including Egypt, Syria and Jordan attempted to wipe it out — is the only way to end the cycle of bloodshed. Israel claims all of Jerusalem as its unified capital.
Hamas has said it would accept a two-state solution on at least an interim basis, but its political program still calls for the “full liberation of Palestine,” including what is now Israel. Hamas has also said it must be part of any postwar settlement.
A deal with Hamas
Hamas has proposed a very different grand bargain — one that, ironically enough, might be more palatable to some Israelis than the US-Saudi deal.
The terror group has proposed a phased agreement in which it would release all of the hostages in return for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners — including senior terrorists convicted of murdering Israelis — as well as the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, a lengthy ceasefire and reconstruction.
That would almost certainly leave Hamas in control of Gaza and potentially allow it to rebuild its military capabilities. Hamas might even claim victory, despite the extensive death and destruction suffered by Palestinian civilians since October 7.
But thousands of Israeli protesters have taken to the streets in recent weeks calling on their leaders to take such a deal, because it’s probably the only way to get the hostages back.
They accuse Netanyahu of standing in the way of such an agreement because it could lead his far-right allies to bring down his government, potentially ending his political career and exposing him to prosecution on corruption charges.
Supporters of such a deal say there would be other benefits for Israel, beyond freeing the hostages.
The low-intensity conflict with Lebanon’s Hezbollah, which the Iran-backed terror group began the day after the Hamas attack, would likely die down as regional tensions ease, allowing tens of thousands of people on both sides of the border to return to their homes. Israel could finally reckon with the security failures that led to October 7.
And it could prepare for another inevitable round of fighting.
Milshtein says Israel should adopt Hamas’s concept of a “hudna” — a prolonged period of strategic calm.
“Hudna doesn’t mean a peace agreement,” he said. “It’s a ceasefire that you will exploit in order to make yourself stronger and then to attack and surprise your enemy.”
While the heart of The Times of Israel’s work takes place in Israel, so many of Jerusalem’s actions are influenced by those in Washington’s halls of power.
As ToI’s US bureau chief, I work to gain access to decision-makers in the United States government so our readers can understand the US-Israel relationship beyond the platitudes evident in public statements.
I'm proud of our ability to inform without sensationalizing, our dedication to be fast while ensuring accuracy, and our determination to present Israel's entire, complex story.
Your support through The Times of Israel Community helps us continue to keep readers around the world properly informed about the critical Israel-US relationship. Do you appreciate our news coverage? If so, please join the ToI Community today.
- Jacob Magid, The Times of Israel's US bureau chief
We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.
That’s why we started the Times of Israel eleven years ago - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.
So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.
For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.
Thank you,
David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel