US President Joe Biden said that Israel’s leaders need to slow down their divisive overhaul of the judiciary and instead strive to achieve a broad consensus with opposition parties on the issue, reportedly warning that the “special relationship” between the two countries could sustain irreparable damage.
Biden made the comments to New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, whom he sat down with in the White House Tuesday after meeting earlier in the day with President Isaac Herzog, who is visiting Washington.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud and its allied far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties have been barreling ahead with their overhaul plan, which has been met with months of mass protests from critics who say it will radically weaken the court’s power to act as a check and balance against the Knesset, and dangerously erode Israel’s democratic foundations.
In addition to protesters blocking roads and disrupting public transportation, pushback against the overhaul has seen groups of military reservists threaten to stop volunteering for special key duties — including piloting fighter jets — if the legislation process continues. Likewise, business leaders and medical staff have called strikes to protest the overhaul.
Speaking to Friedman, Biden expressed public support for the protest movement.
“This is obviously an area about which Israelis have strong views, including in an enduring protest movement that is demonstrating the vibrancy of Israel’s democracy, which must remain the core of our bilateral relationship,” he said.
“Finding consensus on controversial areas of policy means taking the time you need,” said Biden. “For significant changes, that’s essential. So my recommendation to Israeli leaders is not to rush. I believe the best outcome is to continue to seek the broadest possible consensus here.”
Friedman said the administration sees the overhaul issue less as a cross-aisle political debate in the Knesset than as a contest for the essence of Israeli democracy.
The US president, Friedman wrote, is “trying to be respectful of Israel’s right to choose its own path without its American ally intervening in an internal matter,” while at the same time making clear how the developments could affect Israel’s relations with the US.
“He is basically pleading with Netanyahu and his supporters to understand: If we are not seen to share that democratic value, it will be difficult to sustain the special relationship that Israel and America have enjoyed for the last 75 years for another 75 years,” Friedman wrote.
“Message to Israelis, right, left and center: Joe Biden may be the last pro-Israel Democratic president. You ignore his sincere concerns at your peril,” the columnist said.
After weighing in several times in recent months to warn Netanyahu’s government not to advance the original version of its overhaul and to adopt judicial reforms only if they have consensus support, Biden notably made no mention of the issue during his comments to the press when he met with Herzog.
The US president kept his remarks overwhelmingly positive, highlighting his commitment to the Jewish state and to the US-Israel relationship before running through a brief list of accomplishments in the Middle East.
Privately, though, Biden told Herzog that it was vital for coalition and opposition leaders to strike a compromise on judicial reform, according to an Israeli official who shared details with reporters after the meeting on condition of anonymity.
Herzog told Biden that he was working to find common ground between the parties and that he believes in negotiations he has championed, but which are currently frozen, the Israeli official said.
The talks fell apart last month and the government has since resumed advancement of the overhaul, readying to pass the first piece of legislation from the controversial package next week and reanimating the protest movement in the process.
Herzog told reporters outside the White House after the meeting that Biden’s decision to ask about the overhaul wasn’t intended to “annoy” Israel, but was rather a result of his “deep concern” for the country’s democracy. Herzog’s assertion appeared to push back against some of Netanyahu’s allies, who have lashed out or dismissed criticism of the overhaul from the US and other allies as inappropriate interventions in Israel’s internal affairs.
On Monday Biden agreed to meet with Netanyahu later this year after refusing to invite him to the White House since the prime minister was reelected seven months ago and repeatedly speaking out against the government’s overhaul and its “extreme” members who back unrestricted settlement growth in the West Bank.
However, there was no official clarification on when or where the meeting would take place, leading to media speculation that the get-together would not be a state visit to the White House but rather talks on the sidelines of the annual UN General Assembly in New York.
After Biden and Herzog made their public remarks at the White House, the gathered press corps erupted into a barrage of shouted questions at the pair. Channel 13 US correspondent Neria Kraus claimed that a White House transcriber confirmed to her that Biden responded “Yes” to her query if Netanyahu had been invited to the White House.
However, others who were present at the time reported that it was unclear who Biden was addressing with his response.
National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, seeking to dispel suggestions of a meeting at the UN, told Channel 12 on Tuesday that Biden had invited Netanyahu to the White House, and that the meeting would take place in September.
Hanegbi also offered fresh details on the Monday phone call between Netanyahu and Biden that included the invitation, saying the prime minister assured the US leader that the only part of the judicial overhaul that would be discussed after the Knesset’s summer recess was the makeup of the Judicial Selection Committee. The coalition is seeking to change the representation on the panel that chooses court judges, giving the government a majority say.
According to Hanegbi, Netanyahu told Biden that during the Knesset recess he would make great efforts to reach “broad public consensus” on how judges are selected.
On Wednesday, Hanegbi responded to Friedman’s column, saying that the remarks attributed to Biden “were not at all mentioned in the conversation” between the president and Netanyahu, though Friedman’s piece did not imply that they had been.
The phone call, “as depicted by both sides, was ‘positive, warm, and constructive,'” Hanegbi said in a statement, adding that the government would see through its current legislative push to severely curtail judicial review next week, before “pursuing broad public consensus regarding the remainder of the process” during the Knesset’s summer recess.
Netanyahu’s government and overhaul supporters say the legislation is needed to rein in what they see as an over-intrusive and left-leaning court system.
Last week Friedman penned a column warning that the Biden administration was reassessing its ties with Netanyahu’s government, amid growing American alarm over the actions of the hard-right Israeli coalition.
Friedman said Biden believes the government is using its judicial overhaul push as a smokescreen to engage “in unprecedented radical behavior… that is undermining our shared interests with Israel, our shared values and the vitally important shared fiction about the status of the West Bank that has kept peace hopes there just barely alive.”
The op-ed, headlined “The US Reassessment of Netanyahu’s Government Has Begun,” is the latest of several he’s published since Netanyahu’s right-wing bloc’s victory in the November elections.