High Court demand scuttled migrant deportation plan – report
search

High Court demand scuttled migrant deportation plan – report

Rwanda said to have refused to deploy inspectors; Netanyahu says asylum seekers who stay will be sent to kibbutzim

Rwanda reportedly pulled out of a deal with Israel to accept thousands of deported African migrants after the High Court of Justice gave instructions that the resettlement program be monitored by Israeli inspectors. That decision paved the way for Monday’s agreement with the UN that will see many asylum seekers settle in Israel, Hadashot TV news reported.

The last straw for an already reluctant Rwanda came after the court told the government in Kigali that if it wants to go ahead with the deportation plan, it must follow up on the welfare of migrants on its soil.

For the Rwandan government, already under enormous pressure from other African states to drop the plan, the demand was seen as a blow to its sovereignty and so it withdrew, the report said.

The report came hours after the government announced it had scrapped the controversial plan to deport African migrants to third-party countries — understood to be Rwanda and Uganda — and replaced it with a new one, quietly negotiated with the UN, that would see some 16,250 asylum seekers sent to Western countries, while a similar number would remain in Israel.

Citing sources close to Netanyahu, the report said that the government kept a tight lid on the status of the Rwandan plan even after it was aborted, in order to prevent the United Nations refugee agency from improving its negotiating positions.

According to the agreement, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees will work to find homes in Western countries for at least 16,250 of the asylum seekers in Israel, while Israel will agree to give temporary status to the remainder. The status of the latter group will be reevaluated after five years.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and Interior Minister Aryeh Deri, at a press conference announcing the new agreement for handling asylum seekers and illegal African migrants in Israel, at the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, April 2, 2018. (Hadas Parush/Flash90)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday night that the thousands of African migrants who are allowed to stay in the country will be removed from Tel Aviv, where they currently reside, and sent to kibbutzim, agricultural villages, and other communities.

In a Hebrew-language video posted to his Facebook page, Netanyahu defended the newly unveiled plan, which drew criticism from Education Minister Naftali Bennett and residents of south Tel Aviv, who have been campaigning for the removal of the migrants from their neighborhoods.

“I am a full partner in the desire to get all of the infiltrators out of here,” Netanyahu said, using his preferred term for the migrants. “But sometimes there are surprises: The third-party country didn’t withstand the pressure and withdrew from the agreement. Therefore, I needed to get a new deal, even better. It removes 16,000 people in contrast to the deal with the third-party country that would have removed 14,000.”

Netanyahu said that the migrants who remain will be removed from south Tel Aviv and sent to agricultural communities, kibbutzim, and to “strong communities, so that the burden will not fall on the weaker neighborhoods.”

“The money that we will save — and it is a lot — we will invest in rehabilitating south Tel Aviv,” he said “These are the facts. It is worth knowing them.”

The heads of the southern Merhavim and Sdot Negev regional councils rejected Netanyahu’s message, calling it “a sad statement that doesn’t deal with the problem,” and asserting that their communities would not take in any migrants.

“They are moving the problem from south Tel Aviv to ‘agricultural villages and kibbutzim,'” they said in a joint statement. “We understand the need to resolve the migrant problem, not as an afterthought, and not at the expense of the agricultural communities and kibbutzim that are struggling with serious economic problems.”

African migrants in Tel Aviv (photo credit: Nicky Kelvin/Flash90)
African migrants in Tel Aviv (Nicky Kelvin/Flash90/File)

The prime minister first presented the plan earlier Monday at a press conference with Interior Minister Aryeh Deri.

The migrants who leave Israel will be resettled in countries “like Canada or Germany or Italy,” Netanyahu said, without elaborating. Other reports said the United States and Sweden would also take in some of the number.

Deri said migrants who remain will be resettled in communities that campaigned for them to stay in Israel.

“Let’s put them to the test,” he said during the press conference.

“I expect those who said we shouldn’t be removing people and said, ‘Oh, we will take them in,’ to now follow through when put to the test,” he said, instructing his ministry’s director general to “draw up a list” of the communities that offered to be “refuge cities.”

More than 1,000 Israeli families signed up with NGO Miklat Israel to host the asylum seekers at risk when they were still under threat of deportation. Some families signed along with their entire kibbutzim, saying the communities would be a “sanctuary” for refugees.

In a statement Monday, the UNHCR confirmed the agreement and backed up Netanyahu’s promise that the Africans will be relocated from Tel Aviv.

“A joint working group will be set up with a series of objectives and a timetable to implement solutions for some 39,000 people over five years,” UNHCR said.

“UNHCR and the State of Israel will design programs to encourage Eritrean and Sudanese asylum seekers to move out of the neighborhoods in South Tel Aviv where they have mostly congregated,” it added. “Vocational training will also be provided to asylum-seekers for jobs in solar energy, agriculture and irrigation for employment abroad or in Israel.”

The earlier deportation policy had been condemned by Israeli activists and the United Nations as chaotic, poorly executed, and unsafe. Asylum seekers previously deported to Uganda and Rwanda have told The Times of Israel they faced serious danger and even imprisonment after arriving in Africa without proper documents.

read more:
less
comments
more