Execution date set for US Jewish inmate who claimed judge was anti-Semitic
search

Execution date set for US Jewish inmate who claimed judge was anti-Semitic

Randy Halprin, now 41, was sentenced to death in 2003 for murder of Texas cop, has demanded a retrial ‘free of discrimination and bias’

In this December 3, 2003, file photo, death row inmate Randy Halprin, then 26, sits in a visitation cell at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas. (AP Photo/Brett Coomer, File)
In this December 3, 2003, file photo, death row inmate Randy Halprin, then 26, sits in a visitation cell at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas. (AP Photo/Brett Coomer, File)

JTA — An execution date has been set for a Jewish death row inmate in Texas who filed an appeal alleging that the judge in the case was anti-Semitic and racist.

Dallas County Judge Lela Mays on Wednesday approved an October 10 execution date for Randy Halprin.

Halprin, 41, was part of the “Texas 7” group of prisoners who escaped from the John B. Connally Unit near Kenedy, Texas, on December 13, 2000; six were apprehended over a month later. One committed suicide.

They were convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of a Texas police officer who responded to a robbery perpetrated by the prisoners. Four of the prisoners have already been executed.

Illustrative: Prison bars. (Justin Elson/Flickr Commons/via JTA)

Halprin said in the appeal filed in May that Judge Vickers Cunningham referred to him using anti-Semitic language and should have recused himself from his case. Cunningham sentenced Halprin to death in 2003.

“Mr. Halprin’s trial judge, who presided over the death-penalty trial, made critical decisions about what evidence the jury would hear, and sentenced Mr. Halprin to die, was biased against Mr. Halprin, referring to him as a ‘f****n’ Jew’ and a ‘G*****n k**e,'” Halprin’s attorney, Tivon Schardl, said in a statement.

“No execution can proceed until the courts have time to consider the important new evidence that bigotry infected Mr. Halprin’s legal process. Ultimately, the Constitution requires that Mr. Halprin must have a new trial and sentencing hearing, free of discrimination and bias,” Schardl said.

read more:
comments