Unhappy with unequivocal support for Israel, EU heads to seek consensus on Gaza war
Members of 27-nation bloc look to align messaging after rebuking commission chief for backing Israel’s right to self-defense without urging adherence to international law
Following days of confusing and sometimes contradictory messaging about the EU’s stance on the developing Israel-Hamas war, leaders of the bloc’s countries on Tuesday are to try to rally around a clear statement.
“We felt the need to bring some order,” one EU official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue more freely.
A videoconference of the leaders, taking place at 3:30 p.m. GMT and chaired by European Council President Charles Michel, will seek to supersede initial steps taken by the European Commission and its chief, Ursula von der Leyen.
Von der Leyen, who has cultivated a profile as the “face” of the European Union, last Friday flew to Israel to tell Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Europe backed Israel’s right to defend itself.
But that message was delivered without the caution being voiced by other Western leaders — and by the EU’s own top foreign policy official Josep Borrell — that Israeli action must abide by international humanitarian law.
Several EU governments bristled at von der Leyen taking it upon herself to wade into foreign policy matters, which are decided by member countries, without prior consultation and straying from their national positions.
“Foreign affairs is a matter for member states, it is a matter for the (European) Council,” an EU official said.
The commission aimed the same allegation of non-coordination at one of its own last week: Oliver Varhelyi, the commissioner responsible for relations with countries neighboring the EU.
Varhelyi had gone it alone to announce that all disbursement of EU development aid to Palestinians had been frozen because of Hamas’s devastating onslaught in Israel launched on October 7.
After a disconcerted pause, the commission corrected that to say that it would see if payments for development projects in the West Bank and Gaza “need to be adjusted” but that humanitarian aid was not affected.
‘Source of annoyance’
Von der Leyen, too, after taking flak for her declarations in Israel, announced after her return that the commission would triple its humanitarian aid to Palestinians to 75 million euros ($79 million).
The resulting impression left by these individual forays and U-turns is that the EU’s stance on the conflict is chaotic and not worthy of a bloc that wants to project an image of geopolitical heft, EU lawmakers and Brussels observers say.
“This is a source of annoyance for member states,” one EU diplomat said.
The diplomat added that a meeting of EU foreign ministers last week should have set the tone for Brussels’s public stance, especially the emphasis on referencing international humanitarian law, which also reflected the UN’s position.
“But that was rendered unclear basically by the actions of the president of the commission,” the diplomat said.
“I don’t understand what the commission president has to do with EU foreign policy, which she is not in charge of,” said French MEP Nathalie Loiseau.
Commission spokesman Eric Mamer sought Monday to draw parallels between von der Leyen’s trip to war-ravaged Ukraine, under attack from Russia, and her criticized voyage to Israel, during which she inspected the site of a Hamas massacre.
“I don’t remember anybody having criticized the president for going to Ukraine after the outbreak of the war… when she went to Bucha and she saw the body bags,” he said.
“The president can travel wherever she wants.”
Upcoming EU summit
Tuesday’s videoconference was preceded by a statement by EU leaders Sunday strongly condemning Hamas’s “terrorist attacks” while also mentioning “the importance to ensure the protection of all civilians at all times.”
Both the statement and the meeting are an attempt “to bring things back on track so that the EU is speaking about the situation, and not speaking about the EU speaking about the situation,” the diplomat said.
The videoconference — coming a week before leaders are to meet in person at a regular Brussels summit — was to discuss various aspects and implications of the conflict, not least diplomatic efforts to prevent it from escalating into a regional conflagration.
The consequences for European countries, which have public fault lines exposed by polarization over the conflict, and the effects of migrants and refugees flowing from the conflict zones to nearby countries and to Europe would also be discussed, EU officials said.
Hamas, a Palestinian terror group backed by Iran, sent gunmen through the Gaza Strip’s heavily defended border, murdering more than 1,300 people in nearby Israeli towns, kibbutzim, and at a rave party, most of them civilians. They also took some 200-250 hostages.
War erupted after Hamas’s October 7 massacre, which saw at least 1,500 terrorists burst across the border by land, air and sea, under the cover of a deluge of thousands of rockets fired at Israeli towns and cities. The vast majority of those killed as gunmen seized border communities were civilians — men, women, children and the elderly. Entire families were executed in their homes, and over 260 were slaughtered at an outdoor festival, many amid horrific acts of brutality by the terrorists, in what US President Joe Biden has highlighted as “the worst massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust.”
In the 10 days since, Israel has responded with an intense bombing campaign that Gaza health officials say has claimed around 2,750 lives. Israel says its offensive is aimed at destroying Hamas’s infrastructure, and has vowed to eliminate the entire terror group, which rules the Strip.
The IDF is massed along the border with Gaza for what looks like an imminent ground invasion.
