Cities push opioid lawsuits against Sackler family, owners of Purdue

Cities push opioid lawsuits against Sackler family, owners of Purdue

Sacklers and their pharmaceutical firm, facing thousands of state and federal cases, are attempting to reach settlement in bankruptcy court

This May 8, 2007, photo shows the Purdue Pharma logo at its offices in Stamford, Connecticut. (AP Photo/Douglas Healey, File)
This May 8, 2007, photo shows the Purdue Pharma logo at its offices in Stamford, Connecticut. (AP Photo/Douglas Healey, File)

AP — Local government lawsuits against the family that owns Purdue Pharma should be allowed to proceed even as the company attempts to reach a nationwide settlement in US bankruptcy court over the toll of the opioids crisis, according to a court filing on Wednesday.

The filing by 19 cities and towns in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia comes amid acrimonious settlement negotiations with the maker of the painkiller OxyContin that is now playing out in a bankruptcy court in White Plains, New York.

Purdue and members of the family that owns it, the Sacklers, are seeking a grand settlement to end more than 2,600 lawsuits against the company that have been filed in federal court and hundreds more filed against the family in state courts. The federal cases against Purdue and many other players in the opioid industry had been consolidated in US District Court in Cleveland, a process that produced the outlines of a tentative settlement last month between Purdue and some of the plaintiffs.

Purdue’s bankruptcy filing was anticipated under that tentative deal, although half of state attorneys general have rejected the terms so far and have vowed to continue suing the Sacklers in their state courts.

Wednesday’s filing by the local governments argued against having an injunction placed on the lawsuits targeting the family while Purdue’s federal bankruptcy case plays out.

“In light of the well-documented pattern by the Sackler Family of hiding their assets from creditors, the Debtors’ application is simply a transparent and improper effort on the part of the Debtors to protect the bulk of their beneficial owners’ fortune from disclosure and recovery by any of their creditors,” the local governments’ court filing states.

In this photo from August 17, 2018, family and friends who have lost loved ones to OxyContin and opioid overdoses leave pill bottles in protest outside the headquarters of Purdue Pharma, which is owned by the Sackler family, in Stamford, Connecticut. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill, File)

The family, which Forbes magazine listed in 2016 as one of the 20 wealthiest in the country, said the bankruptcy judge should halt all lawsuits against it.

“The stay is designed to allow all parties, even those parties who oppose that proposed settlement, to collaborate in finding a solution to the current litigation morass that the company faces,” descendants of Raymond Sackler, one of the late patriarchs of the company, said in a statement. “We are hopeful the bankruptcy court will grant the stay so that progress toward meaningful solutions can continue. If a stay is not granted, precious resources will be wasted on litigation expenses and that will benefit no one.”

Last month, New York’s attorney general said in a legal filing that the family had used Swiss and other hidden bank accounts to transfer $1 billion to themselves. An Associated Press investigation found that the Sacklers have sought to shield their fortune through a web of companies and trusts, many of them based outside the US.

The settlement terms call for Purdue to contribute as much as $12 billion over time to help states and local governments address the opioid crisis, with the Sackler family contributing $3 billion to $4.5 billion. The amount depends on how much they would get from selling their international drug companies.

Purdue’s subsequent bankruptcy filing removes the Stamford, Connecticut-based company from the first federal trial over the toll of the opioids crisis, scheduled to begin later this month in Cleveland.

Wednesday’s filing by the cities and towns says the settlement discussions remain “in their infancy” and that neither Purdue nor the Sackler family has so far made financial disclosures. Those disclosures are necessary to show whether the Sacklers would actually make good on their promise to pay, according to the court filing.

The local governments also take aim at a statement in a Purdue legal filing that sought to have all lawsuits against the family halted. That filing said the Sacklers might be “unwilling or unable to make the billions of dollars of contributions” if they have to face additional lawsuits.

The local government lawyers say that with the family willing to back out and half states pushing back, the nationwide settlement long sought by the Sacklers is unlikely to happen.

Some state attorneys general are expected to make similar arguments in filings due to the bankruptcy court by Friday.

Join us!
A message from the Editor of Times of Israel
David Horovitz

The Times of Israel covers one of the most complicated, and contentious, parts of the world. Determined to keep readers fully informed and enable them to form and flesh out their own opinions, The Times of Israel has gradually established itself as the leading source of independent and fair-minded journalism on Israel, the region and the Jewish world.

We've achieved this by investing ever-greater resources in our journalism while keeping all of the content on our site free.

Unlike many other news sites, we have not put up a paywall. But we would like to invite readers who can afford to do so, and for whom The Times of Israel has become important, to help support our journalism by joining The Times of Israel Community. Join now and for as little as $6 a month you can both help ensure our ongoing investment in quality journalism, and enjoy special status and benefits as a Times of Israel Community member.

Become a member of The Times of Israel Community
read more: