Knesset speaker rejects High Court recommendation that MKs redo tainted vote for state comptroller

Sam Sokol is a former political correspondent at The Times of Israel. He was previously a reporter for the Jerusalem Post, Jewish Telegraphic Agency and Haaretz. He is the author of "Putin’s Hybrid War and the Jews"

Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana votes for the next state comptroller at the plenum of the Knesset, in Jerusalem, June 3, 2026 (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana votes for the next state comptroller at the plenum of the Knesset, in Jerusalem, June 3, 2026 (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana rejects last week’s High Court recommendation that lawmakers rerun their vote of Michael Rabello for the position of state comptroller due to concerns that the required secrecy of the ballot was violated in the original, highly controversial election this month.

“The Knesset has already spoken,” Ohana writes in a post on X. In a short announcement attached to his post, Ohana writes that “for all the reasons detailed in the preliminary response to the petition and during the hearing,” he has decided not to hold a repeat vote.

Last Thursday, during a hearing to consider a petition against the vote by the opposition, court Deputy President Noam Sohlberg said that the justices were “suggesting a procedural step that does not interfere with the discretion of the Knesset. In simple Hebrew: do it again.”

Sohlberg gave the respondents — the Knesset itself, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Rabello, who is Netanyahu’s longtime lawyer — until Monday to respond, saying that otherwise the court would issue a conditional order against them.

The petitions noted that at least seven coalition MKs had recorded themselves voting for coalition candidate Rabello, allegedly on the instructions of senior Likud officials who wanted them to demonstrate their loyalty. The petitioners argued that the requirement of Basic Law: State Comptroller that the election be held by secret ballot was therefore violated.

According to Channel 13, Ohana’s decision was made despite disagreement from the Knesset’s legal advisers and will likely lead to an interim ruling and a further hearing in the High Court.

Most Popular
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.