NATO says no to new ‘arms race’ as US, Russia rip up weapons treaty
search

NATO says no to new ‘arms race’ as US, Russia rip up weapons treaty

But alliance chief also places blame for demise of INF treaty on Moscow, expresses support for Washington

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg gestures as he delivers a speech during a press conference about the end of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) headquarters, in Brussels, on August 2, 2019 (Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg gestures as he delivers a speech during a press conference about the end of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) headquarters, in Brussels, on August 2, 2019 (Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)

WASHINGTON (AFP) — NATO said Friday it hoped to avoid a new arms race with Russia and not deploy nuclear weapons on European soil after Washington and Moscow ripped up a landmark Cold War-era missile pact.

The 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty concluded by then-US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev limited the use of medium-range missiles, both conventional and nuclear.

Both sides had signaled their intention to pull out of the treaty for months, trading accusations of breaking the terms of the deal.

“Russia is solely responsible for the treaty’s demise,” US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a prepared statement announcing Washington’s formal withdrawal at a regional forum in Bangkok, minutes after Russia pronounced the agreement void.

Russia’s deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov called on the United States and other NATO members to implement a moratorium on deploying intermediate-range nuclear missiles, now that the deal is dead.

NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg put the blame squarely on Russia, dismissing the suggestion of a moratorium as not credible while saying the 29-country transatlantic alliance did not want to see a renewed battle for military supremacy.

“We will not mirror what Russia does,” Stoltenberg told a press conference in Brussels.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg delivers a speech during a press conference about the end of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) headquarters, in Brussels, on August 2, 2019 (Kenzo TRIBOUILLARD / AFP)

“We don’t want a new arms race. And we have no intention to deploy new land-based nuclear missiles in Europe,” he noted.

Ryabkov questioned those pledges, saying “such assurances cannot be taken for granted.”

It was clear that the treaty’s termination had sparked security fears in Europe.

“Europe must not become the scene of a new arms race,” Austrian Foreign Minister Alexander Schallenberg said.

Under the deal, missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,420 miles) were eliminated.

That paved the way for the mothballing of Russian SS-20 missiles and American Pershing missiles deployed in Europe.

For years, Washington has accused Russia of developing a new type of missile, the 9M729, which it says violates the treaty — claims that NATO has backed up.

The missile has a range of about 1,500 kilometers, according to NATO, though Moscow says it can only travel 480 kilometers.

“Russia failed to return to full and verified compliance through the destruction of its noncompliant missile system,” Pompeo said, referring to the 9M729 ground-launched cruise missile.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo arrives to speak at the State Department, June 13, 2019, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

NATO backed Washington, saying it would “respond in a measured and responsible way to the significant risks posed by the Russian 9M729 missile to Allied security.”

Stoltenberg said the 9M729 was nuclear-capable, mobile and difficult to attack, able to hit European cities with only minutes of warning time.

The White House launched a six-month withdrawal procedure for leaving the treaty in February.

Soon after, Moscow began its move to pull out, and last month Russian President Vladimir Putin formally suspended its participation.

The INF treaty was considered a cornerstone of the global arms control architecture.

But the United States accused Russia of repeated violations and said the bilateral pact had given other countries — namely China — free rein to develop their own long-range missiles.

Illustrative: US President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin arrive for a meeting in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP)

US-China tensions — mainly over trade and maritime disputes — have been center stage at the meeting of foreign ministers from the Association of Southeast Asian nations in Bangkok this week, where Pompeo has peddled Washington’s “Indo-Pacific” strategy to counter Beijing’s economic and military might in Asia.

Pompeo said Friday the US was “seeking a new era of arms control that moves beyond the bilateral treaties of the past,” calling on Beijing to join discussions.

“The United States calls upon Russia and China to join us in this opportunity to deliver real security results to our nations and the entire world.”

The INF deal was seen as one of two key arms deals between Russia and the US — the other being the New START treaty, which keeps the nuclear arsenals of both countries well below their Cold War peak.

That deal expires in 2021 and there appears to be little political will from Moscow or Washington to renew it, experts say.

China has already rebuffed calls from the US to join the New START treaty in the future.

The demise of the INF has sparked fears of a new era of weapons development between the heavyweights.

Last year, Putin announced plans to develop new weapons, including a medium-range land-based missile and a land-based version of the Kalibr missiles that have already successfully been used by the navy and tested in Syria.

The US and Russia own more than 90 percent of global nuclear stockpiles, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

“The end of the treaty could spark a new nuclear arms race,” it said.

read more:
comments