High Court annuls Levin’s pick in Sde Teiman probe, but upholds his right to select supervisor

A hearing on who will have authority over the Sde Teiman leak probe, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, November 11, 2025. (Miriam Alster/FLASH90)
A hearing on who will have authority over the Sde Teiman leak probe, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, November 11, 2025. (Miriam Alster/FLASH90)

The High Court of Justice annuls Justice Minister Yariv Levin’s decision to appoint State Ombudsman for Judges Asher Kula to oversee the criminal investigation into the Sde Teiman video leak affair, but upholds his right to appoint an official to supervise the investigation outside the prosecution agencies.

The court says Kula cannot be granted authority to oversee the investigation due to explicit limitations in the law for the ombudsman banning the officeholder from serving in any other position or carrying out any other function.

The court says that Levin did, however, have the authority to appoint an official outside the Attorney General’s Office and the State Attorney’s Office, due to the “highly irregular and extreme circumstances” of the situation. Liberal government watchdog groups had argued that Levin’s appointment violated democratic principles by which politicians should not be involved in the criminal investigation process.

In the case, former military advocate general Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi has admitted that she authorized the leak of a video last year purporting to show the abuse of a Palestinian security detainee by IDF soldiers at the Sde Teiman military facility. She then lied about the matter while ostensibly leading the investigation to find the leaker.

Levin, who has for months sought to push Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara out of office, then moved to install State Ombudsman Kula to oversee the criminal investigation, arguing that Baharav-Miara had a conflict of interest because she previously oversaw what appears to have been a compromised investigation by the Military Advocate General’s Office.

Baharav-Miara eventually agreed to step away from the case but insisted that it should be run by State Attorney Amit Aisman. Levin rejected this arrangement, arguing that, as her subordinate, Aisman too was compromised.

The court says that any new appointment by Levin must abide by all relevant laws and court decisions.

Most Popular
If you’d like to comment, join
The Times of Israel Community.
Join The Times of Israel Community
Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits.
Please use the following structure: example@domain.com
Confirm Mail
Thank you! Now check your email
You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community! We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.